Hard or Soft Sell? Understanding White Papers as Content Marketing

Kim Sydow Campbell; Jefrey S. Naidoo; Sean M. Campbell

doi:10.1109/tpc.2019.2961000

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2020

Hard or Soft Sell? Understanding White Papers as Content Marketing

Kim Sydow Campbell University of North Texas ; Jefrey S. Naidoo University of Alabama ; Sean M. Campbell

Abstract

Background: Although some have noted that combining technical and marketing content is precarious, technical communication professionals are increasingly involved in content marketing, which includes the creation of white papers. Literature review: The little existing literature on white papers provides conflicting guidance about managing the combination of technical and marketing content. Both soft-sell and hard-sell marketing approaches have been recommended. One source of such inconsistent guidance may be the lack of agreement about definitions. Research on print advertisements has described hard and soft selling as multidimensional rather than binary aspects of persuasive appeals. Research question: Which dimensions of hard and soft-sell appeals are predominant in white papers? Research methodology: To complete our descriptive study, we collected a corpus of documents labeled as white papers in TechRepublic, and then selected and trained three raters to complete a series of judgments about dimensions of persuasive appeals in the corpus. We aggregated those ratings, calculating the mean and standard deviation for the dimensions to describe their distribution across the corpus. Results/discussion: Overall, hard-sell dimensions were more prevalent than soft-sell dimensions. However, the soft-sell category of “implicitness” was also dominant. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the value of treating hard and soft selling as multidimensional, complementary, and combinatory marketing appeals that allow, for example, a single white paper to be both “subjective” (soft sell), and “precise” (hard sell), or both “creative” (soft sell) and “informative” (hard sell).

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2020-03-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2019.2961000
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: technical communication book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

Wall et al. (2018)

The art of selling-without-selling: Understanding the genre ecologies of conten…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Campbell et al. (2017)

Rhetorical Move Structure in High-Tech Marketing White Papers

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Andersen (2014)

Rhetorical Work in the Age of Content Management

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Mackiewicz (2012)

Relying on Writing Consultants

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
McNair et al. (2010)

Activity Theory, Speech Acts, and the ‘‘Doctrine of Infelicity’’: Connecting La…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 6 →

Jong et al. (2000)

Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓

10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.10.001

↗
10.1177/0261927X09351676

↗
10.1177/1080569912454713

↗
10.1037/h0070123

↗
10.1177/002224379503200111

↗
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.003

↗
10.2753/JOA0091-3367390201

↗
holliman (2014)

Business to business digital content marketing: Marketers’ perceptions of best practice

J Res Interactive Marketing ↗
10.1080/15332861.2010.526487

↗
10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.002

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.586

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Hard or Soft Sell? Understanding White Papers as Content Marketing

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (6)

Related Articles