The Textualizing Functions of Writing for Organizational Change

Donald L. Anderson University of Denver

Abstract

This article examines the role of writing during an attempt at organizational change. Through the investigation of conversational and writing practices used by members of a project team at a high-tech corporation, the article argues that writing has a textualizing function. In the context of members’work toward organizational change, writing served as a textualizing practice that documented, fixed, and stabilized ideas developed in conversation. Written forms that create general truths out of individual experiences help both to define the organizational change to come and to create the change as an object to be distributed and consumed by organizational members. The results of the study describe how writing helps to stabilize organizational reality to enable change to occur.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2004-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651903260800
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (31) · 7 in this index

  1. Anderson, D. L. (2002). Dialogism and organizational change: Discourse and intertextual…
  2. 10.1080/00909889309365376
  3. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. N. & Ackerman, J. (1991). Social context and socially constructed texts: The ini…
  4. Czarniawska, B. & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating orga…
  5. Devitt, A. J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman…
Show all 31 →
  1. 10.1108/09534819910300855
  2. 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080330
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper-Colophon.
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. 10.1177/002194369503200201
  8. 10.2307/3069414
  9. Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. & Jick, T. D. (1992). The challenge of organizational change: How companies exper…
  10. 10.5465/amr.2000.3707707
  11. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
  12. 10.1080/10245289908523518
  13. Written Communication
  14. Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II (K. Blamey & J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Evan…
  15. 10.1080/10714429909368575
  16. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  17. Samson, D. (1995). Writing in high-tech firms. In J. F. Reynolds, C. B. Mathalene, J. N. Magnotto, D. C. Sams…
  18. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  19. 10.1080/10245280108523557
  20. Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Aston, UK: University of Birmingham.
  21. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00118.x
  22. Taylor, J. R. & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Thatchenkery, T. J. (1992). Organizations as“texts”: Hermeneutics as a model for understanding organizational…
  24. Thatchenkery, T. J. (2001). Mining for meaning: Reading organizations using hermeneutic philosophy. In R. Wes…
  25. Technical Communication Quarterly
  26. Written Communication