Modeling Writing Processes and Predicting Text Quality in Technical Communication

Zhijun Gao Peking University ; Lin Dong University of International Business and Economics ; Jiangying Wang Peking University

Abstract

Combining keystroke logging, screen recordings, interviews, and text quality assessment in two mixed-methods studies with technical writers, this research (1) identifies defining variables of technical writing processes and (2) examines their correlations with and predictive power for text quality. Study 1, an exploratory investigation with 10 participants, identified 22 distinct writing behaviors under six categories of information searching, information reusing, content shaping, organization structuring, language styling, and layout designing during planning, translating, and reviewing sessions. These behavioral variables, together with time-related variables, were subsequently analyzed as “process indicators” in a comparative experiment with 43 participants across experience levels. Results of Study 2 revealed significant differences among experience levels in writing speed, planning duration, pause, search, reuse, content shaping, and structuring. Detailed planning and systematic content/structure editing were strongly associated with higher-quality texts. Building on these findings, we propose a process model of technical writing, explain its correlations with writing score, and depict process profiles of different experience levels. We also highlight the importance of information processing skills in enhancing writing efficiency, offering empirical guidance for technical writing instruction and professional training.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883251372212
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (55) · 16 in this index

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. Baaijen V. M. Galbraith D. (2018). Discovery through writing: Relationships with writing processes and text q…
  3. Written Communication
  4. Barkaoui K. (2016). What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on t…
  5. 10.1163/9789004253254_011
Show all 55 →
  1. The phycology of written composition
  2. 10.1163/9789004253254_007
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Bråten I. Strømø H. I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognitio…
  5. 10.1207/s1532690xci1202_2
  6. Cantera M. A. Arevalo M. -J. García-Marina V. Alves-Castro M. (2021). A rubric to assess and improve technica…
  7. Translog-II: A program for recording user activity data for empirical reading and writing…
  8. Written documents in the workplace
  9. Choi I. Deane P. (2020). Evaluating writing process features in an adult EFL writing assessment context: A ke…
  10. Choi Y. H. (2007). On-line revision behavior in EFL writing process. English Teaching 62(4) 69-93. https://do…
  11. Conijn R. Cook C. van Zaanen M. Van Waes L. (2022). Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke loggi…
  12. Conijn R. Speltz E. D. Chukharev-Hudilainen E. (2021). Automated extraction of revision events from keystroke…
  13. Written Communication
  14. Deane P. (2014). Using writing process and product features to assess writing quality and explore how those f…
  15. Dong L. Gao Z. (2023). Who are China’s technical writers? A survey on the state of diversity equity and inclu…
  16. Written Communication
  17. College Composition and Communication
  18. The role of task representation in reading to write
  19. College Composition and Communication
  20. Technical writing: Process and product
  21. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  22. Written Communication
  23. Hayes J. R. Flower L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist 41(10) 1106-1113. htt…
  24. Instructional development paradigms
  25. Written Communication
  26. Kellogg R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.
  27. Journal of Writing Research
  28. Kim H. (2020). Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing strategy and impacts on text…
  29. Journal of Writing Research
  30. Survey on the development of technical writing in China and its implications for MTI education
    Foreign Language Research
  31. Structured technical writing and content management
  32. 10.1145/169059.169166
  33. 10.1163/9789004253254_006
  34. Do curricula correspond to managerial expectations? Core competencies for technical commu…
    Technical Communication
  35. Sasaki M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second…
  36. Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology
  37. Sinharay S. Zhang M. Deane P. (2019). Prediction of essay scores from writing process and product features us…
  38. Technical Communication Quarterly
  39. Tech Comm’s core competencies
    Intercom
  40. Technical Communication Quarterly
  41. 10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1
  42. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  43. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494219
  44. 10.1023/A:1003990432398
  45. Handbook of writing research
  46. Wei Z. Shang H. Briody P. (2012). The relationship between English writing ability levels and EFL learners’ m…
  47. 10.2190/NETC5
  48. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  49. Analyzing pauses in computer-assisted EFL writing: A computer keystroke-log perspective
    Educational Technology and Society
  50. Quantitative psychology