Written Communication Jan 2026

Modeling Writing Processes and Predicting Text Quality in Technical Communication

Zhijun Gao Peking University ; Lin Dong University of International Business and Economics ; Jiangying Wang Peking University

Abstract

Combining keystroke logging, screen recordings, interviews, and text quality assessment in two mixed-methods studies with technical writers, this research (1) identifies defining variables of technical writing processes and (2) examines their correlations with and predictive power for text quality. Study 1, an exploratory investigation with 10 participants, identified 22 distinct writing behaviors under six categories of information searching, information reusing, content shaping, organization structuring, language styling, and layout designing during planning, translating, and reviewing sessions. These behavioral variables, together with time-related variables, were subsequently analyzed as “process indicators” in a comparative experiment with 43 participants across experience levels. Results of Study 2 revealed significant differences among experience levels in writing speed, planning duration, pause, search, reuse, content shaping, and structuring. Detailed planning and systematic content/structure editing were strongly associated with higher-quality texts. Building on these findings, we propose a process model of technical writing, explain its correlations with writing score, and depict process profiles of different experience levels. We also highlight the importance of information processing skills in enhancing writing efficiency, offering empirical guidance for technical writing instruction and professional training.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883251372212
Open Access
Closed
Topics
writing pedagogy multimodality technical communication

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Blythe et al. (2014)
    Professional and Technical Communication in a Web 2.0 World
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Baaijen et al. (2012)
    Keystroke Analysis
    Written Communication
  3. Connelly et al. (2012)
    Predicting the Quality of Composition and Written Language Bursts From Oral Lan…
    Written Communication
  4. Hayes (2012)
    Modeling and Remodeling Writing
    Written Communication
  5. Swarts (2010)
    Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks From Reusable Content
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Graham et al. (2008)
    Mode, Medium, and Genre
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Slattery (2007)
    Undistributing Work Through Writing: How Technical Writers Manage Texts in Comp…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Spinuzzi (2007)
    Guest Editor's Introduction: Technical Communication in the Age of Distributed Work
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Winsor (2001)
    Learning to Do Knowledge Work in Systems of Distributed Cognition
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. DUFFY et al. (1987)
    Technical Manual Production
    Written Communication
  6. KELLOGG (1987)
    Writing Performance
    Written Communication
  7. Faigley et al. (1981)
    Analyzing Revision
    College Composition and Communication
  8. Flower et al. (1981)
    A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. Abdel Latif M. M. M. (2021). Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing assessment. As…
     ↗
  2. Baaijen V. M. Galbraith D. (2018). Discovery through writing: Relationships with writing processes and text q…
     ↗
  3. Barkaoui K. (2016). What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on t…
     ↗
  4. 10.1163/9789004253254_011
     ↗
  5. 10.1163/9789004253254_007
     ↗
  6. Bråten I. Strømø H. I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognitio…
     ↗
  7. 10.1207/s1532690xci1202_2
     ↗
  8. Cantera M. A. Arevalo M. -J. García-Marina V. Alves-Castro M. (2021). A rubric to assess and improve technica…
     ↗
  9. Choi I. Deane P. (2020). Evaluating writing process features in an adult EFL writing assessment context: A ke…
     ↗
  10. Choi Y. H. (2007). On-line revision behavior in EFL writing process. English Teaching 62(4) 69-93. https://do…
     ↗
  11. Conijn R. Cook C. van Zaanen M. Van Waes L. (2022). Early prediction of writing quality using keystroke loggi…
     ↗
  12. Conijn R. Speltz E. D. Chukharev-Hudilainen E. (2021). Automated extraction of revision events from keystroke…
     ↗
  13. Deane P. (2014). Using writing process and product features to assess writing quality and explore how those f…
     ↗
  14. Dong L. Gao Z. (2023). Who are China’s technical writers? A survey on the state of diversity equity and inclu…
     ↗
  15. Hayes J. R. Flower L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist 41(10) 1106-1113. htt…
     ↗
  16. Kellogg R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Rese…
     ↗
  17. Kim H. (2020). Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing strategy and impacts on text…
     ↗
  18. Leijten M. Van Waes L. Schriver K. Hayes J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using…
     ↗
  19. 10.1145/169059.169166
     ↗
  20. 10.1163/9789004253254_006
     ↗
  21. Sasaki M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second…
     ↗
  22. Sinharay S. Zhang M. Deane P. (2019). Prediction of essay scores from writing process and product features us…
     ↗
  23. 10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1
     ↗
  24. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494219
     ↗
  25. 10.1023/A:1003990432398
     ↗
  26. Wei Z. Shang H. Briody P. (2012). The relationship between English writing ability levels and EFL learners’ m…
     ↗
  27. 10.2190/NETC5
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2022
    Using Multimedia for Instructor Presence in Purposeful Pedagogy-Driven Online Technical Writing Courses ↗
    Heidi Skurat Harris; Michael Greer
    writing pedagogy curriculum design multimodality online writing instruction technical communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2021
    Using Multimedia for Instructor Presence in Purposeful Pedagogy-Driven Online Technical Writing Courses ↗
    Heidi S. Harris; Michael Greer
    writing pedagogy curriculum design multimodality online writing instruction technical communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2017
    Wearable Writing ↗
    Jason Chew Kit Tham
    first-year composition writing pedagogy qualitative research multimodality technical communication race and writing
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 2012
    The Development of a Project-Based Collaborative Technical Writing Model Founded on Learner Feedback in a Tertiary Aeronautical Engineering Program ↗
    Dietmar Tatzl; Wolfgang Hassler; Bernd Messnarz; Holger Flühr
    writing pedagogy multimodality technical communication multilingual writers
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2002
    Book Reviews: From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations in a History of Technical Communication in the United States, Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing, Double Fold: Libraries and the Assault on Paper, Interacting with Audiences: Social Influences on the Production of Scientific Writing, a Short History of Writing Instruction: From Ancient Greece to Modern America, Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined ↗
    Jeff Todd; David Beard; Heather Sehmel; Russell Willerton; Kirk St. Amant
    writing pedagogy multimodality technical communication scientific writing