Practicing “Safe” Technical Communication

Paul M. Dombrowski University of Central Florida

Abstract

The nuclear power industry is undergoing a renaissance, led by initiatives from the Obama administration and several states. In light of this development and the growing information economy, it is crucial that the public be well-informed, effective, and responsible regarding important technological issues. For this reason, undergraduate education, whether for technical or non-technical majors, must include an awareness of the complexity, ambiguity, and interestedness of the use of technical language and information. This is particularly important in communication involving public discourse and perceptions. I discuss here how I foster such awareness in my junior-level technical writing course for non-majors. We focus on the concept “safe” in relation to radiation and nuclear power. This is done in the overall context of making a recommendation for nuclear power as an energy source for the state of Florida for the next two decades, a realistic and urgent technical communication situation. Students see that standards and even the definitions of crucial terms shift depending on context and social circumstances, and that real-world choices involve trade-offs and balances between advantages and disadvantages.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2011-07-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.41.3.c
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (37) · 6 in this index

  1. 10.1017/S1466046603035610
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre: Strategies for Stability and Change
  4. Gore A., An Inconvenient Truth, Climate Crisis: The Film. [Online]. Available: http://www.climatecrisis.net/a…
  5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Online]. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch
Show all 37 →
  1. Natural Resources Defense Council. [Online]. Available: http://www.nrdc.org
  2. “Trinity,”
  3. “Information on the Trinity Site,”
  4. “Virginia-class Attack Submarine,”
  5. Dateline: Los Alamos
  6. “Project Plowshare,”
  7. The Firecracker Boys
  8. “Sandia to Pressurize ¼ Scale Model of Nuclear Reactor Containment Vessel Until It Fails,”
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4899-6002-3
  10. McCarthy J. “Chernobyl.” [Online]. Available: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/chernobyl.html (as …
  11. “Chernobyl: The True Scale of the Accident,”
  12. “Fact Sheet on the Three Mile Island Accident,”
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031860
  15. “Potential Rail, Barge and Truck Routes to Yucca Mountain,”
  16. “F-4 Crash Test,”
  17. “Video: Department of Energy, Cask Drop Testing,”
  18. Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America
  19. “Exposure of the American Population to Radioactive Fallout from Nuclear Weapons Tests: A…
  20. “Space Radiation,”
  21. “Space Radiation—Frequently Asked Questions,”
  22. “The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History, The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima,”
  23. “Hiroshima Navigator.”
  24. “The Manhattan Project: An Interactive History, The Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki,”
  25. “Welcome to Nagasaki in Japan,”
  26. “Photo Gallery,”
  27. Ethics in Technical Communication
  28. 10.2190/HAT
  29. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  30. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  31. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  32. Technical Communication Quarterly