Analyzing Safety Communication in Industrial Contexts

Claas Digmayer RWTH Aachen University ; Eva-Maria Jakobs RWTH Aachen University

Abstract

Work in industrial contexts is confronted with various risks, which are further amplified by the trend toward Industry 4.0. Approaches are needed to examine safety communication (SC) in such changing environments. Existing studies focus on individual SC means and quantitative evaluation measures. This article proposes a qualitative approach for analyzing SC with which a process chain in a metal-working company is investigated. The results reveal that SC is implemented as a complex system of communicative means. Weaknesses in this system entail several problems at the level of both workplaces and process chains. Due to a lack of digitalization, SC does not meet the requirements of Industry 4.0. Several task areas for communication professionals are identified in optimizing SC. These include content preparation for existing SC means according to work contexts and related tasks, creating digital SC content, and increasing the companies’ resilience to novel risks.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2022-07-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816211014126
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 15 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000724
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-95129-4_12
  3. 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012
  4. 10.1108/00483481011017426
  5. 10.3390/safety4040044
  6. 10.3390/su11020384
  7. 10.1037/a0016172
  8. 10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.003
  9. Cornelissen, P. A. (2019). Speaking of safety. University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036547062
  10. 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009
  11. 10.1002/ffo2.23
  12. Deleted for blind review & Spinuzzi C (2014). 20 Professional domains: Writing as creation of economic value.…
  13. 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.012
  14. 10.1080/15578771.2014.886642
  15. 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00013-8
  16. 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
  17. 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.013
  18. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.286
  19. 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030
  20. 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.005
  21. 10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101914
  22. 10.3390/safety4010005
  23. Karreman, J., van Norel, N., Uiters, E. & Beaujean, D. (2014, October). How to design work related informatio…
  24. 10.1080/014492999118913
  25. 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.002
  26. 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.06.005
  27. 10.1007/978-3-319-77492-3
  28. 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.012
  29. 10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5
  30. 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.06.004
  31. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  32. Mohammadfam, I., Kamalinia, M., Momeni, M., Golmohammadi, R., Hamidi, Y. & Soltanian, A. (2017). Evaluation o…
  33. 10.3390/safety5030051
  34. 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.10.003
  35. 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.020
  36. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.043
  37. 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.018
  38. 10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016
  39. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  40. 10.1145/344599.344646
  41. 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.005
  42. 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029
  43. 10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_1
  44. 10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_5
  45. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00421.x
  46. 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.001
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →