Changing Climate, Changing Terrain: The Stasis Metaphor and the Climate Crisis

Shelton Weech Purdue University West Lafayette

Abstract

Rhetorical theory has frequently relied on metaphors of place and positioning as heuristics to build better arguments. This article utilizes one such metaphor, that of stasis theory, as a method by which we might change the terrain of the conversation surrounding the climate crisis. As an example, the author does a rhetorical analysis of a recent agricultural report from the Indiana Climate Change Impacts Assessment and finds that, rather than using traditional questions of conjecture and quality, the authors of the report focus on questions of procedure and definition to reframe the discussion surrounding the climate crisis. Drawing from the rhetoric in this report, the author suggests that technical communicators might similarly produce more fruitful conversations around the climate crisis if they focus on what to do (procedure) and redefining the crisis as a local issue (definition).

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2022-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281620966988
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/s10503-016-9403-9
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2007.897619
  3. 10.1525/9780520353237
  4. Cicero M. T. (2007). Cicero’s treatise on the topics (C. D. Yonge, Trans.). The Logic Museum. http://www.logi…
  5. 10.1080/03637755009375016
  6. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  7. 10.5744/rhm.2019.1009
  8. 10.1007/s10584-016-1627-z
  9. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002
  10. 10.1002/9781119265771.ch12
  11. 10.1145/3375134.3375135
  12. 10.4103/cs.cs_19_15
  13. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1050436
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →