Using Bayesian induction methods in risk assessment and communication

Communication Design Quarterly Aug 2020

Using Bayesian induction methods in risk assessment and communication

J. D. Applen

Abstract

Bayes's theorem allows us to use subjective thinking to find numerical values to formulate assessments of risk. It is more than a mathematical formula; it can be thought of as an iterative process that challenges us to imagine the potential for "unknown, unknowns." The heuristics involved in this process can be enhanced if they take into consideration some of the established risk assessment and communication models used today in technical communication that are concerned with the social construction of meaning and the kairos involved in rhetorical situations. Understanding the connection between Bayesian analysis and risk communication will allow us to better convey the potential for risk that is based on probabilistic assumptions.

Journal: Communication Design Quarterly
Published: 2020-08-12
DOI: 10.1145/3394264.3394265
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Topics: multimodality technical communication argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

Walsh et al. (2016)

Perspectives on Uncertainty for Technical Communication Scholars

Technical Communication Quarterly
Ding (2013)

Transcultural Risk Communication and Viral Discourses: Grassroots Movements to …

Technical Communication Quarterly
Ding (2009)

Rhetorics of Alternative Media in an Emerging Epidemic: SARS, Censorship, and E…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Grabill et al. (1998)

Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the ro…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Porter (1986)

Intertextuality and the discourse community

Rhetoric Review

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓

10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

↗
10.1080/02691728.2013.862880

↗
Godfrey-Smith P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chic…

↗
10.1080/00028533.2012.11821771

↗
10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00700.x

↗
Hulme M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy inaction and opportunity. Ca…

↗
Jaynes E. T. (2003) Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge University Press. Jaynes E. T. (2003…

↗
10.1353/con.2004.0022

↗
10.1177/0162243909337121

↗
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02616.x

↗
10.1080/136698798377240

↗
10.1177/0162243910377624

↗
10.1177/1075547098020001019

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →