Shelton Weech

4 articles
Utah Valley University ORCID: 0000-0002-2998-6622

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Weech

Shelton Weech's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (66% of indexed citations) · 3 total indexed citations from 2 clusters.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 2
  • Rhetoric — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Human-Centered, Tool-Assisted: Engaging Critically with Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Technical Editing Classroom
    doi:10.1080/10572252.2026.2646515
  2. “That’s What You’re Supposed to Do on Twitter”: Emotion, Affect, and Positivity in Online Climate Science Communication
    doi:10.1080/10572252.2025.2593828
  3. Building ethical distributed teams through sustained attention to infrastructure
    Abstract

    Building sustainable infrastructure is a core principle of Constructive Distributed Work (CDW), an integrated approach to project management and team building. In this article, we explain the origins of CDW and describe the theory of sustainable infrastructure that underpins our approach to training, supporting, and coordinating work across a diverse and distributed team. We illustrate how mapping strategies can help us make infrastructure more visible, and therefore more available for reflection and iteration, and demonstrate how a participatory approach to developing and sustaining infrastructure helps our team maintain its commitment to more ethical and inclusive research practices.

    doi:10.1145/3507857.3507861
  4. Changing Climate, Changing Terrain: The Stasis Metaphor and the Climate Crisis
    Abstract

    Rhetorical theory has frequently relied on metaphors of place and positioning as heuristics to build better arguments. This article utilizes one such metaphor, that of stasis theory, as a method by which we might change the terrain of the conversation surrounding the climate crisis. As an example, the author does a rhetorical analysis of a recent agricultural report from the Indiana Climate Change Impacts Assessment and finds that, rather than using traditional questions of conjecture and quality, the authors of the report focus on questions of procedure and definition to reframe the discussion surrounding the climate crisis. Drawing from the rhetoric in this report, the author suggests that technical communicators might similarly produce more fruitful conversations around the climate crisis if they focus on what to do (procedure) and redefining the crisis as a local issue (definition).

    doi:10.1177/0047281620966988