Value Arguments in Science Research Articles

Michael Carter North Carolina State University

Abstract

It is in the interest of scholarly journals to publish important research and of researchers to publish in important journals. One key to making the case for the importance of research in a scholarly article is to incorporate value arguments. Yet there has been no rhetorical analysis of value arguments in the literature. In the context of rhetorical situation, stasis theory, and Swales’s linguistic analysis of moves in introductions, this article examines value arguments in introductions of science research articles. Employing a corpus of 60 articles from three science journals, the author analyzes value arguments based on Toulmin’s definition of argument and identifies three classes of value arguments and seven functions of these arguments in introductions. This analysis illuminates the rhetorical construction of value in science articles and provides a foundation for the empirical study of value in scholarship.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2016-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088316653394
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/47.749366
  2. 10.1093/applin/aml021
  3. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
  4. 10.1080/03637755009375016
  5. 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00046-8
  6. Fecher B., Friesike S. (2014). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In Bartling S., Friesike S. (…
  7. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00227.x
  8. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  9. 10.1080/13614576.2011.574495
  10. 10.1515/text.2003.007
  11. 10.1057/9780230511910
  12. 10.1080/00335630.2010.499106
  13. 10.1080/03637755809375225
  14. Reich E. S. (2013). Science publishing: The golden club. Nature, 502(7471). Retrieved from www.nature.com/new…
  15. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
  16. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  17. 10.1080/17459430701617929
  18. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  20. Van Noorden R. (2013). Open access: The true cost of scientific publishing. Nature, 495(7442). Retrieved from…
  21. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →