Abstract

This article analyzes the speeches of two U.S. politicians—President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden—to present how they make their arguments about climate change using various frames. While frames are rhetorical acts, they are also a form of persuasion. In particular, the author demonstrates how Trump foregrounded negative frames with fear-inducing elements. He presented job losses and economic harm as consequences of joining the Paris Climate Accord, putting him on the defensive. In contrast, Biden utilized positive frames to strengthen his arguments and aligned more closely with the environmental justice framework. Inspired by the rhetoric of the framing strategies employed by these two speakers, the study suggests that technical communicators should focus on using language that constructs new frames to enhance the success of their argumentations.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816231225932
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (38) · 5 in this index

  1. American Presidency Project. (2020 September 14). Remarks by Vice President Joe Biden in Wilmington Delaware …
  2. Why social justice matters
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304846
  5. Cohen B. (2020 November 7). Young voters motivated by climate change and environmental justice helped propel …
Show all 38 →
  1. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches
  2. Eilperin J. (2016). Trump says ‘nobody really knows’ if climate change is real (20 August 2023). Washington P…
  3. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Learn about environmental justice (2022 September 02). United States…
  4. Metaphors and emotions as framing strategies in argumentation
    EAPCogSci Proceedings
  5. Ethics Sage. (2018 August 8). What are values? https://www.ethicssage.com/2018/08/what-are-values.html
  6. 10.1080/17524030902916624
  7. Funk C. Hefferon M. (2019 November 25). U.S. public views on climate and energy (2022 November 17). Pew Resea…
  8. 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2001.tb00015.x
  9. 10.7330/9781607327585
  10. The ethos of rhetoric
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. 10.7330/9781607327585.c010
  13. 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012242
  14. Lakoff G. (2016 July 23). Understanding Trump. George Lakoff. https://georgelakoff.com/2016/07/23/understandi…
  15. The all new don't think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate
  16. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
  17. The coding manual for qualitative searchers
  18. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
  19. 10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
  20. 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
  21. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact
  22. Trump D. (2017). Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord (2022 August 24). Energy and Enviro…
  23. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  24. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1406843
  25. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2020). Climate change funding and management (2022 November 12). http…
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x
  27. 10.4324/9780429198748
  28. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  29. 10.54395/jot-ww9v6
  30. White House. (2008 April 16). President Bush discusses on climate change (2022 November 12). https://georgewb…
  31. White House. (2015 December 15). Statement by the President on the Paris Climate Agreement. https://obamawhit…
  32. White House. (2017 June 1). Statement by President Trump on the Paris climate accord (2022 November 12). http…
  33. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication