Abstract

This article analyzes the speeches of two U.S. politicians—President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden—to present how they make their arguments about climate change using various frames. While frames are rhetorical acts, they are also a form of persuasion. In particular, the author demonstrates how Trump foregrounded negative frames with fear-inducing elements. He presented job losses and economic harm as consequences of joining the Paris Climate Accord, putting him on the defensive. In contrast, Biden utilized positive frames to strengthen his arguments and aligned more closely with the environmental justice framework. Inspired by the rhetoric of the framing strategies employed by these two speakers, the study suggests that technical communicators should focus on using language that constructs new frames to enhance the success of their argumentations.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816231225932
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304846
  2. 10.1080/17524030902916624
  3. 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2001.tb00015.x
  4. 10.7330/9781607327585
  5. 10.7330/9781607327585.c010
  6. 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012242
  7. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
  8. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
  9. 10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
  10. 10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
  11. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1406843
  12. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.x
  13. 10.4324/9780429198748
  14. 10.54395/jot-ww9v6
  15. 10.1109/47.238054
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →