Climate Change Research Across Disciplines: The Value and Uses of Multidisciplinary Research Reviews for Technical Communication

Lauren E. Cagle University of South Florida ; Denise Tillery University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Abstract

The authors performed an interdisciplinary literature review of research on communication and climate change. The authors reviewed STEM, social science, and risk analysis journals to synthesize recent publications on climate change communication which could support research in technical communication. Several applications are proposed for technical communication research, including using this review to contextualize local qualitative work, to spur interdisciplinary projects and address gaps in multidisciplinary literature, and reconsider a role for advocacy in technical communication.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2015.1001296
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (13)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 13 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Poroi
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 47 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/13669877.2012.657219
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1003187107
  3. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0279:EOCAOA]2.0.CO;2
  4. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
  5. 10.3197/096327110X12699420220554
  6. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x
  7. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
  8. 10.1080/13669877.2011.601319
  9. 10.3197/096327193776679945
  10. Ecosee: Image, rhetoric, nature
  11. 10.1038/nsmb1110-1287
  12. 10.1080/13669870701281462
  13. 10.1080/17524030902916624
  14. 10.3197/096327111X12922350165996
  15. 10.1177/0013916505277998
  16. 10.1080/13669870801939498
  17. 10.1177/0013916506297215
  18. 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
  19. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
  20. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
  21. 10.1111/0272-4332.202019
  22. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
  23. 10.1080/13669870600613658
  24. 10.1177/0306312709341598
  25. 10.1111/0272-4332.215164
  26. 10.1080/17524030902916574
  27. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01800.x
  28. 10.1353/con.2004.0022
  29. 10.1080/17524030902916657
  30. 10.3197/096327110X531543
  31. 10.1177/0013916509357696
  32. 10.1080/136698798377123
  33. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x
  34. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x
  35. 10.1126/science.260.5114.1571
  36. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01836.x
  37. 10.1177/0013916511421196
  38. 10.1126/science.1195624
  39. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/305
  40. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00693.x
  41. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design
  42. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/302
  43. 10.1177/0013916508314998
  44. 10.1109/TPC.2006.885868
  45. 10.1080/13669870701746316
  46. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306
  47. 10.1080/13669870701552235
CrossRef global citation count: 37 View in citation network →