Philosophy & Rhetoric Aug 2014

A Modern Theory of Stasis

Michael J. Hoppmann

Abstract

Abstract This article revisits stasis theory, the rhetorical tool that outlines the strategic options of a defendant in a moral or legal accusation. By analyzing the burden of proof of an accuser and deducing a comprehensive model for a modern theory of stasis from the resulting obligations, it develops a system of ten vital staseis (key issues), each of which is by itself sufficient for a defense in front of a reasonable audience. The resulting modern theory of stasis can be a useful heuristic tool for the rhetorical defense against moral and legal accusations as well as for the systematic analysis of judicial speeches and debates.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2014-08-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.47.3.0273
Open Access
Closed
Topics
multimodality multilingual writers argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Niebauer (2023)
    What <i>Is</i> the Church? Defining Communal Commonplac…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Aikin et al. (2022)
    Fallacies of Meta-argumentation
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Weech (2022)
    Changing Climate, Changing Terrain: The Stasis Metaphor and the Climate Crisis
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Matheson (2019)
    Stasis in the Net of Affect
    Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Graham et al. (2011)
    Talking Off-Label: The Role of<i>Stasis</i>in Transforming the Discursive Forma…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Brizee (2008)
    Stasis Theory as a Strategy for Workplace Teaming and Decision Making
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barwick, Karl. 1961. “Augustins Schrift ‘De Rhetorica’ und Hermagoras von Temnos.” Philologus 105:97–110.
     ↗
  2. Barwick, Karl. 1964. “Zur Erklärung und Geschichte der Staseislehre des Hermagoras von Temnos.” Philologus 10…
     ↗
  3. Barwick, Karl. 1965. “Zur Rekonstruktion der Rhetorik des Hermagoras von Temnos.” Philologus 109:186–218.
     ↗
  4. Goodwin, Jean. 2002. “Designing Issues.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric, ed. Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosse…
     ↗
  5. Heath, Malcolm. 1994. “The Substructure of Stasis-Theory from Hermagoras to Hermogenes.” Classical Quarterly …
     ↗
  6. Heath, Malcolm. 2002. “Hermagoras: Transmission and Attribution.” Philologus 146:287–98.
     ↗
  7. Kauffeld, Fred. 1998. “Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Ac…
     ↗
  8. Kauffeld, Fred. 2002. “Pivotal Issues and Norms in Rhetorical Theories of Argumentation.” In Dialectic and Rh…
     ↗
  9. Kauffeld, Fred. 2003. “The Ordinary Practice of Presuming and Presumption with Special Attention to Veracity …
     ↗
  10. Marsh, Charles. 2012. “A Legal Semiotics Framework for Exploring the Origins of Hermagorean Stasis.” Internat…
     ↗
  11. Meyer, Ernst. 1951. “Die Quaestiones der Rhetorik und die Anfänge juristischer Methodenlehre.” Zeitschrift de…
     ↗
  12. Nadeau, Ray. 1958. “Hermogenes on ‘Stock Issues’ in Deliberative Speaking.” Speech Monographs 25:51–71.
     ↗
  13. Santa Cruz, José. 1958. “Der Einfluß der rhetorischen Theorie der Status auf die römische Jurisprudenz, insbe…
     ↗
  14. Schünemann, Bernd. 1984. “Einführung in das strafrechtliche Systemdenken.” In Grundfragen des modernen Strafr…
     ↗
  15. Schwalbach, Theodor. 1881. “Zur Geschichte der Lehre von den Processeinreden.” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftu…
     ↗
  16. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge…
     ↗
  17. Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Law…
     ↗
  18. Walton, Douglas. 1988. “Burden of Proof.” Argumentation 2:233–54.
     ↗
  19. Wenzel, Joseph. 2003. “Arguers' Obligations: Another Perspective.” In Anyone Who Has a View, ed. Frans H. van…
     ↗
  20. Woerther, Frédérique. 2012. “Hermagoras et la doctrine des [asystata].” Mnemosyne 65:179–202.
     ↗
  21. Wood, David. 2002. “Retribution, Crime Reduction, and the Justification of Punishment.” Oxford Journal of Leg…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Jan 2025
    Rhetorics of Authenticity: Ethics, Ethos, and Artificial Intelligence ↗
    Adrianna Deptula; Paul Thompson Hunter; Richard Johnson-Sheehan
    multimodality artificial intelligence professional writing multilingual writers voice and style argument
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 2023
    Focusing on Governance for a Real Client in a Content Strategy Course ↗
    Tharon Howard
    graduate education multimodality multilingual writers argument
  3. Poroi Jan 2022
    The Gendered Ethos of Pseudoscience: Feminized Discourse on Food Safety in the Blogosphere ↗
    Flemming Schneider Rhode; Tisha Dejmanee
    discourse analysis multimodality social media multilingual writers voice and style argument
  4. Written Communication Jul 2018
    “No Facts Equals Unconvincing”: Fact and Opinion as Conceptual Tools in High School Students’ Written Arguments ↗
    Jon-Philip Imbrenda
    curriculum design multimodality multilingual writers argument
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2015
    The Rhetorics of Recognition in Geontopower ↗
    Elizabeth A. Povinelli
    multimodality multilingual writers argument