Abstract

Prior scholarship argues that facts derived from data are not separate from their contexts and values. In this study of a data journalism team, I define and apply a sociotechnical network approach to stasis that maps their rhetorical actions with their quantitative work. The stasis network methodology identified how their process confronted competing definitions of metrics, which impacted their sense of what was significant and ethically possible, when developing the goals for their report.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2024.2306259
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. Metrics
  2. 10.1145/3472714.3473616
  3. 10.1002/asi.23563
  4. 10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
  5. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn0g
  6. 10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001
  7. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
  8. 10.2307/3178066
  9. 10.1186/1476-072X-8-33
  10. 10.1109/TPC.2020.3032053
  11. 10.7551/mitpress/11543.001.0001
  12. 10.1145/3328020.3353954
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  14. 10.1109/TPC.2022.3144826
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →