The Linguistic Representation of Rhetorical Function

Written Communication Oct 2009

The Linguistic Representation of Rhetorical Function

Trine Dahl Norwegian School of Economics

Abstract

This article deals with how economists present their new knowledge claim in the genre of the research article. In the discipline of economics today, the claim is typically included not only in the obvious results/discussion section(s) but also in three other locations of the article: the abstract, the introduction, and the conclusion. The present study considers whether the rhetorical function of each of these three text parts has an impact on the linguistic realization of the claim. The corpus consists of 25 articles from two international journals, European Economic Review and Journal of International Economics. The investigation shows that economist authors commonly draw their readers’ attention to the claim by means of signaling expressions such as Our main finding is that . . . , not only in the introduction but also in the conclusion. The simple present seems to be the preferred tense in the claim sentence, even in the conclusion ( We find . . . / We argue . . .). The discussion of these findings includes the views of discipline insiders, providing clear indications of the strategic nature of the research communication process.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2009-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088309341241
Open Access: Closed
Topics: scientific writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Carter (2021)

The Construction of Value in Science Research Articles: A Quantitative Study of…

Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

Harwood (2006)

(In)appropriate Personal Pronoun Use in Political Science

Written Communication
HYLAND (1996)

Talking to the Academy

Written Communication
SWALES et al. (1987)

The Writing of Research Article Introductions

Written Communication

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓

10.1016/S0748-5751(98)00011-6

↗
10.2307/256856

↗
Bloor, M. & Bloor, T. ( 1993). How economists modify propositions. In W. Henderson, T. Dudley-Evans , & R. Ba…

↗
10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00049-7

↗
10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006

↗
10.1075/pbns.148

↗
Gnutzmann, C. & Oldenburg, H. ( 1991). Contrastive text linguistics in LSP research: Theoretical consideratio…

↗
10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00090-0

↗
10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001

↗
10.1075/pbns.54

↗
10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.004

↗
10.1016/0889-4906(87)90073-1

↗
10.1093/applin/10.1.1

↗
10.1016/0378-2166(92)90013-2

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139524827

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →