Abstract

This article examines United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID's) maternal health (MH) success stories as transnational assemblages that deploy security logics to justify external governance while appearing to celebrate local agency. Through rhetorical-cultural analysis of 25 narratives, I identify three recurring strategies—crisis amplification, representational homogenization, and paratextual techniques—that frame MH as requiring urgent intervention. These stories obscure local expertise and align care with donor-defined metrics and narrative arcs. Findings show that security logics circulate through genre conventions and design templates that normalize intervention as technical and humanitarian. I argue TPC scholars must examine assemblage mechanisms’ role in shaping representation, risk, and care transnationally.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816251384927
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1515/9781474413640
  2. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjn0g
  3. 10.1057/9781137365729
  4. 10.1111/gec3.12192
  5. 10.1002/9781118241868
  6. 10.7208/chicago/9780226072074.001.0001
  7. van der Ree G. (2013). The politics of scientific representation in international relations. Millennium: Jour…
  8. 10.1080/09662839.2021.2021889
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →