The <i>Topoi</i> of Small Business Entrepreneurship

Emily Barrow DeJeu Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

Despite students’ growing interest in entrepreneurship education (EE), the small body of research exploring rhetorical strategies for proposing new business ventures has focused only on the argument strategies that startup entrepreneurs use when delivering oral pitches to investors. This study, by contrast, explores the topoi, or lines of argument, that small business entrepreneurs use in written business plans created for bank lenders. Small business entrepreneurs use nine topoi in order to accomplish two rhetorical goals: justifying their ventures, via the creation of stability-focused value propositions, and establishing their entrepreneurial credibility. Ultimately, I argue that small business entrepreneurs use these topoi to frame their ventures as low-risk and stable, which contrasts with startup entrepreneurs’ arguments that their ventures are innovative and disruptive. In addition to learning strategies for highlighting innovation and disruption, EE students would likely benefit from learning rhetorical strategies for minimizing risk and emphasizing stability.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883231171866
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  5. Written Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 43 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4018/978-1-4666-4999-6.ch002
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2607804
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00857.x
  4. 10.5465/amr.2009.40633190
  5. 10.2139/ssrn.1262343
  6. 10.5465/amj.2009.36462018
  7. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.002
  8. 10.1080/13691060802151945
  9. 10.1038/nbt0602supp-BE33
  10. 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00921-2
  11. 10.1108/JMD-05-2014-0049
  12. 10.1002/smj.349
  13. 10.5465/amle.2004.14242103
  14. 10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0334
  15. 10.1075/scl.16.02flo
  16. 10.37514/PRA-B.2019.0230
  17. 10.1177/216507991306100104
  18. 10.1016/j.jm.2002.11.002
  19. 10.5465/amj.2016.1215
  20. 10.1515/erj-2013-0062
  21. 10.5465/AMBPP.2020.17893symposium
  22. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
  23. 10.1080/13691060701414840
  24. 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235824
  25. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2607818
  26. 10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00154
  27. 10.1177/0266242604042377
  28. 10.5367/000000003101299474
  29. 10.1177/2515127417737286
  30. 10.1177/002194360203900103
  31. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00531.x
  32. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  33. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
  34. 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
  35. 10.1080/10749039.2017.1294606
  36. 10.1109/TPC.2014.2342354
  37. 10.1109/TPC.2015.2415277
  38. 10.1075/pbns
  39. 10.1177/0266242618818249
  40. 10.1179/1743288X11Y.0000000014
  41. 10.1177/2515127421992519
  42. 10.37514/WAC-J.2014.25.1.03
  43. 10.1177/2515127420979195
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →