Abstract

Discussion sections of research articles are important because they are where researchers make claims for advancing knowledge in their fields. There has been a growing interest in research articles focused on Discussions. However, only a few studies have centered on the role of arguments. What is missing in this literature is the potential for rhetoricians to identify specific, sentence-level arguments. The idea is that to analyze persuasion in Discussions, rhetoricians should be able to identify arguments contributing to persuasion. Toward that aim, I refer to Aristotle’s Rhetoric as a catalyst for specific arguments and examples from thirty science research articles.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2023-10-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2023.2269010
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (23) · 2 in this index

  1. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse
  2. 10.18869/acadpub.ijal.18.1.1
  3. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001
  4. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
  5. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activist of the Experimental Article in Science
Show all 23 →
  1. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power
  2. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.001
  3. “Sentence Length in Education Research Articles: A Comparison between Anglophone and Turk…
    Linguistics Journal
  4. Writing Science
  5. 10.4324/9780203431269
  6. 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
  7. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding
  8. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003
  9. 10.1057/9780230511910
  10. 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00003-1
  11. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.002
  12. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001
  13. “Exploring Gender Differences in Cross-Disciplinary Discourse: Interactional Metadiscours…
    Language in India,
  14. 10.1515/9783110214406.165
  15. Written Communication
  16. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
  17. Written Communication
  18. 10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1