Rhetoric of Science: Enriching the Discipline

Abstract

The author discusses how pursuing a rhetoric of science has consequences for both our understanding of science and our practice of rhetorical analysis. From a rhetorical perspective, science becomes a persuasive enterprise continuous with other persuasive practices in a culture. And rhetoric itself requires enrichment in three areas to become a better instrument of analysis for scientific texts; it needs to incorporate early modern dialectic, a more flexible stylistics, and an appreciation of the role of visualization in scientific argument.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2005-07-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_5
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. Baigre, Brian S. Ed. Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in …
  2. 10.1017/S0269889703000863
  3. Ceccarelli, Leah. Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. Chicago: U…
  4. Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.
  5. 10.1126/science.287.5451.253
  6. Harris, Randy Allen. "Introduction." Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1…
  7. 10.1038/356739a0
  8. 10.1038/423376a
  9. Mack, Peter. Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden, Ne…
  10. 10.1038/35082594
  11. 10.1177/007327537601400301
    History of Science  
  12. 10.1038/171737a0
    Nature  
  13. 10.1128/JB.182.16.4458-4465.2000
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →