Abstract

Drawing on a text-based ethnography of digital writing in a biology laboratory, this article examines the text trajectory of a scientific manuscript and a scientific team’s related writing for public audiences, including for citizen scientists. Using data drawn from texts, observations, interviews, and related artifacts, the author examines how scientists conceptualize and adapt their multimodal writing for specialized scientific audiences as well as lay audiences interested in the work of scientific inquiry. Three concepts— meaning compression, meaning expansion, and meaning attention—were used to analyze the multimodal strategies that scientists employ when composing for different audiences. Findings suggest that while scientists often restrict their writing practices to meaning compression to maintain the values and conventions of scientific genres, they also sometimes deploy a wider range of multimodal strategies when writing for nonspecialist audiences. These findings underscore the complex rhetorical environments scientists navigate and the need to support emerging scientific writers’ development as versatile writers able to adapt varied multimodal strategies to diverse rhetorical and epistemic goals.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318809361
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 29 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015684.001.0001
  2. 10.1177/004839318101100305
  3. 10.1177/030631284014002001
  4. 10.7551/mitpress/4130.001.0001
  5. 10.1177/0306312709359219
  6. 10.4324/9781410600097
  7. 10.1177/0963662513498202
  8. 10.2307/j.ctv6wgfc3
  9. 10.1080/10570310109374708
  10. 10.1177/0306312705055535
  11. 10.1177/1075547017736892
  12. 10.37514/PER-B.2016.0759
  13. 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1425:TROCSA]2.0.CO;2
  14. 10.2307/798843
  15. 10.4324/9781315231099
  16. 10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
  17. 10.1177/0306312706054047
  18. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00341.x
  19. 10.1177/0162243907303598
  20. 10.1080/01596300500200011
  21. Kelly A. R., Autry M. K. (2013). Access, accommodation, and science: Knowledge in an “open” world. First Mond…
  22. 10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
  23. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00246-5
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology  
  24. 10.1515/text-2017-0017
  25. 10.26818/9780814213988
  26. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.06.004
  27. 10.1111/2041-210X.12581
  28. 10.4324/9781315160191-2
  29. 10.37514/PER-B.2011.2379.2.02
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →