Written Communication Oct 2013

Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience

María José Luzón Universidad de Zaragoza

Abstract

New media are having a significant impact on science communication, both on the way scientists communicate with peers and on the dissemination of science to the lay public. Science blogs, in particular, provide an open space for science communication, where a diverse audience (with different degrees of expertise) may have access to science information intended both for nonspecialist readers and for experts. The purpose of this article is to analyze the strategies used by bloggers to communicate and recontextualize scientific discourse in the realm of science blogs. These strategies involve adjusting information to the readers’ knowledge and information needs, deploying linguistic features typical of personal, informal, and dialogic interaction to create intimacy and proximity, engaging in critical analysis of the recontextualized research and focusing on its relevance, and using explicit and personal expressions of evaluation. The article shows that, given the diverse audience of science posts, bloggers display a blending of discursive practices from different discourses and harness the affordances of new media to achieve their rhetorical purposes.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088313493610
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism discourse analysis assessment scientific writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (14)

  1. Sterk et al. (2025)
    Popularization Writing Skills Development: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Wri…
    Written Communication
  2. Mehlenbacher et al. (2025)
    Misinformation As Genre Function: Insights on the Infodemic from a Genre-Theore…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Falconer (2024)
    The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening t…
    Written Communication
  4. Moriarty et al. (2024)
    Reddit and Engaged Science Communication Online: An Examination of Reddit’s R/S…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Stewart (2023)
    Using digital media in the classroom as writing platforms for multimodal author…
    Computers and Composition
Show all 14 →
  1. Pérez-Llantada (2022)
    Online Data Articles: The Language of Intersubjective Stance in a Rhetorical Hybrid
    Written Communication
  2. Frith (2020)
    Technical Standards and a Theory of Writing as Infrastructure
    Written Communication
  3. Weber (2020)
    The News from Mars
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Reid (2019)
    Compressing, Expanding, and Attending to Scientific Meaning: Writing the Semiot…
    Written Communication
  5. Bray (2019)
    How Do Online News Genres Take Up Knowledge Claims From a Scientific Research A…
    Written Communication
  6. Luzón (2017)
    Connecting Genres and Languages in Online Scholarly Communication: An Analysis …
    Written Communication
  7. Gruber (2017)
    Three Forms of Neurorealism: Explaining the Persistence of the “Uncritically Re…
    Written Communication
  8. Szymanski (2016)
    Constructing Relationships Between Science and Practice in the Written Science …
    Written Communication
  9. Dahl (2015)
    Contested Science in the Media: Linguistic Traces of News Writers’ Framing Activity
    Written Communication

References (36) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060240
     ↗
  2. Blanchard A. (2011)
    Common knowledge: The challenge of transdisciplinarity
  3. 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
     ↗
  4. 10.4324/9780203928240-11
     ↗
  5. 10.1177/0957926504043705
     ↗
Show all 36 →
  1. Clancy K. (2011). Networking, scholarship and service: The place of science blogging in academia. Retrieved f…
  2. 10.1007/978-94-009-5239-3_2
     ↗
  3. Davies J. (2007)
    A new literacies sampler
  4. Dobrin D. (1983)
    New essays in technical and scientific communication
  5. FAHNESTOCK (1998)
    Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts
    Written Communication
  6. Fahnestock (2004)
    Preserving the Figure: Consistency in the Presentation of Scientific Arguments
    Written Communication
  7. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.001
     ↗
  8. Gibson J. J. (1979)
    Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology
  9. Gilbert G. N. (1984)
    Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists discourse
  10. Gramling C. (2008)
    Geotimes
  11. 10.1558/japl.2004.1.3.247
     ↗
  12. 10.1177/030631290020003006
     ↗
  13. Hunston S. (1993)
    Register analysis: Theory and practice
  14. 10.1515/text.2002.021
     ↗
  15. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
     ↗
  16. 10.1016/S0195-6310(00)80026-5
     ↗
  17. 10.1177/1075547004273022
     ↗
  18. 10.1093/applin/amr021
     ↗
  19. Mortensen T. (2002)
    Researching ICTs in context
  20. 10.1177/1461445603005002006
     ↗
  21. Myers G. (2010)
    The discourse of blogs and wikis
  22. 10.1016/0889-4906(91)90004-G
     ↗
  23. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
     ↗
  24. Paul (2004)
    Spreading Chaos: The Role of Popularizations in the Diffusion of Scientific Ideas
    Written Communication
  25. Qian H., Scott C. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communicatio…
     ↗
  26. Salager-Meyer F. (2001)
    LSP and Professional Communication
  27. Swales J. (1990)
    Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
  28. Trench B. (2008)
    Handbook of public communication of science and technology
  29. Varghese et al. (2004)
    Book-Length Scholarly Essays as a Hybrid Genre in Science
    Written Communication
  30. 10.1007/978-94-009-5239-3_1
     ↗
  31. 10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 149 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Jul 1998
    Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts ↗
    JEANNE FAHNESTOCK
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy assessment professional writing scientific writing affect and writing
  2. Argumentation Oct 2025
    Practical Argumentation and Rhetorical Structure Theory ↗
    Nancy Green
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2025
    Corporate Disclosure During COVID-19: A Close Reading and Discourse Analysis ↗
    Tolulola Lawal
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis assessment professional writing
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2025
    Presenting and Making Relevant: Analyzing Teaching Assistant Perceptions of Writing in Statistics Using Semantic Frames ↗
    Ben Markey
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis graduate education teacher development assessment technical communication professional writing
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Social Justice and “Harmful Tech”: Dis-Orienting Militarized Research ↗
    Calvin Pollak; Sanvi Bhardwaj
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development technical communication scientific writing race and writing disability studies editorial matter