How Do Online News Genres Take Up Knowledge Claims From a Scientific Research Article on Climate Change?

Written Communication Jan 2019 OA PDF

How Do Online News Genres Take Up Knowledge Claims From a Scientific Research Article on Climate Change?

Nancy Bray

Abstract

The Internet has helped to change who writes about science in the news, how news is written, and how it is taken up by different audiences. However, few studies have examined how these changes have impacted the uptake of scientific claims in online news writing. This case study explores how online news genres take up knowledge claims from a research article on climate change over a period of one year and shows how shifting boundaries between rhetorical communities affect genre uptake. The study results show that online news writers predominantly use the news report genre to cover research findings for 48 hours, after which they predominantly use the news editorial genre to engage these findings. Analysis suggests that the news report genre uses the press release and the article abstract as intermediary genres, but the news editorial uses only the abstract. I argue that the switch between genres repositions the scientist, the journalist, and the public epistemologically, a reorientation that favors uptake in news media outlets supporting action to mitigate climate change and its effects.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2019-01-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088318804822
Open Access: OA PDF Bronze
Topics: genre theory qualitative research scientific writing affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

Falconer (2024)

The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening t…

Written Communication
Moriarty et al. (2024)

Reddit and Engaged Science Communication Online: An Examination of Reddit’s R/S…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Watts (2021)

Rethinking Graduate School Research Genres: Communicating With Industry, Writin…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Cooke (2021)

Genre Uptake as Boundary-Work: Reasoning About Uptake in <i>Wikipedia</i> Articles

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (4)

Luzón (2013)

Public Communication of Science in Blogs

Written Communication
Tachino (2012)

Theorizing Uptake and Knowledge Mobilization

Written Communication
BERKENKOTTER et al. (1993)

Rethinking Genre from a Sociocognitive Perspective

Written Communication
FAHNESTOCK (1986)

Accommodating Science

Written Communication

Also cites 33 works outside this index ↓

10.1177/0033688205060051

↗
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001

↗
10.1002/9781118313978.ch22

↗
10.4324/9780203483794

↗
10.1177/1461445603005002308

↗
10.7330/9781607324430.c003

↗
10.1177/1464884911412697

↗
10.1038/nchem.991

↗
10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003

↗
10.1177/074108839301000400

↗
10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067

↗
10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143

↗
10.1177/135485650401000405

↗
10.1177/146144804044329

↗
10.1038/nature14016

↗
10.1080/00335638409383686

↗
10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_1

↗
10.1177/146144560300500200

↗
10.1177/009365002236196

↗
10.2307/2393771

↗
10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00229-x

↗
10.5325/j.ctv8j4cn

↗
10.1075/pbns.188.03pus

↗
10.7330/9781607324430.c000

↗
10.1177/107769900608300302

↗
10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001

↗
10.1145/1026533.1026560

↗
10.1145/344599.344646

↗
10.1177/030631289019003001

↗
10.1093/applin/7.1.39

↗
10.7330/9781607324430.c009

↗
10.1086/267786

↗
10.4324/9780203062784

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →