Abstract

The Internet has helped to change who writes about science in the news, how news is written, and how it is taken up by different audiences. However, few studies have examined how these changes have impacted the uptake of scientific claims in online news writing. This case study explores how online news genres take up knowledge claims from a research article on climate change over a period of one year and shows how shifting boundaries between rhetorical communities affect genre uptake. The study results show that online news writers predominantly use the news report genre to cover research findings for 48 hours, after which they predominantly use the news editorial genre to engage these findings. Analysis suggests that the news report genre uses the press release and the article abstract as intermediary genres, but the news editorial uses only the abstract. I argue that the switch between genres repositions the scientist, the journalist, and the public epistemologically, a reorientation that favors uptake in news media outlets supporting action to mitigate climate change and its effects.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318804822
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (78) · 4 in this index

  1. Altmetric. (n.d.). Altmetric—Top 100 articles—2015. Retrieved from https://www.altmetric.com/top100/2015/#explore
  2. 10.1177/0033688205060051
  3. Genre and the new rhetoric
  4. The language of news media
  5. Written Communication
Show all 78 →
  1. The rhetorical situation
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  2. Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change
  3. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
  4. 10.1002/9781118313978.ch22
  5. Science and the media alternative routes in scientific communication
  6. 10.4324/9780203483794
  7. A rhetoric of motives
  8. 10.1177/1461445603005002308
  9. Critchlow A. (2015 January 8). Climate change scaremongering won’t trouble oil junkies. Telegraph. Retrieved …
  10. Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in pr…
  11. 10.7330/9781607324430.c003
  12. Handbook of public communication of science and technology
  13. Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology
  14. Ecotone. (2018). Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved from www.oed.com/view/Entry/59403
  15. Factcheck.org. (n.d.). Our mission. Retrieved from http://www.factcheck.org/about/our-mission/
  16. Written Communication
  17. 10.1177/1464884911412697
  18. 10.1038/nchem.991
  19. The place of genre in learning: Current debates
  20. The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change
  21. Freedman A. (2015 January 7). Study shows how much coal oil and gas must stay untouched to solve global warmi…
  22. Friends of Science. (n.d.). Friends of science. Retrieved from https://www.friendsofscience.org/
  23. Professional feature writing
  24. Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line
  25. Good K. (2015 January 8). Stop the oil rigs! Study states we HAVE to keep fossil fuels in ground before 2050.…
  26. Greene B. (2015 January 8). Climate stasis. Junk Science. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150111…
  27. The Guardian our readers & circulation. (2010 April 30). Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com…
  28. The professional journalist: A guide to the practices and principles of the news media
  29. Hone D. (2015 January 15). Climate and global energy: The answer lies after 2050. Energy Collective. Retrieve…
  30. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
  31. 10.1177/074108839301000400
  32. King B. (2015 August 12). On Linda McQuaig’s comments carbon budgets and keeping oil sands “in the ground.” A…
  33. 10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs067
  34. Kumar C. (2015 November 30). What to expect from India—and the world—at the Paris climate summit. Quartz. Ret…
  35. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society
  36. Laboratory of life: The construction of scientific facts
  37. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
  38. Written Communication
  39. 10.1177/135485650401000405
  40. 10.1177/146144804044329
  41. 10.1038/nature14016
  42. News writing
  43. McSweeney R. (2016). Analysis: The climate papers most featured in the media in 2015. Carbon Brief. Retrieved…
  44. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  45. Genre and the new rhetoric
  46. 10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_1
  47. Miller C. R. Shepherd D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In Gurak L. Anton…
  48. 10.1177/146144560300500200
  49. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology covers science and technology
  50. Newsworks. (2015). Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.newsworks.org.uk/The-Daily-Telegraph
  51. 10.1177/009365002236196
  52. 10.2307/2393771
  53. Mass media as an information channel and public arena
    Risk: Health, Safety, & Environment
  54. 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00229-x
  55. 10.5325/j.ctv8j4cn
  56. 10.1075/pbns.188.03pus
  57. 10.7330/9781607324430.c000
  58. The “why,” “who,” and “how” of the editorial page
  59. Newswriting and reporting: The complete guide for today’s journalist
  60. 10.1177/107769900608300302
  61. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  62. 10.1145/1026533.1026560
  63. 10.1145/344599.344646
  64. 10.1177/030631289019003001
  65. 10.1093/applin/7.1.39
  66. Written Communication
  67. 10.7330/9781607324430.c009
  68. 10.1086/267786
  69. University College London. (2015 January 7). Which fossil fuels must remain in the ground to limit global war…
  70. Approaches to media discourse
  71. 10.4324/9780203062784
  72. van Oosten E. (2015 September 22). Why negotiation and the IPCC are unlikely to make sure that we are safe. R…
  73. Watts A. (n.d.). Watts up with that. Retrieved from https://wattsupwiththat.com/