Genre Uptake as Boundary-Work: Reasoning About Uptake in <i>Wikipedia</i> Articles

Ana Cooke Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

The circulation of scientific and technical genres in online publics can shape both public opinion and policy deliberation about issues such as global warming. While rhetoric and professional writing scholarship has documented the myriad ways that genres are transformed as they circulate across discursive boundaries, few examine how argument shapes those transformation and circulations. Drawing on Gieryn’s concept of boundary-work, this article analyzes arguments in the discussion pages of Wikipedia articles about global warming to document how editors argue about genre as they deliberate over what counts as reliable sources of global warming knowledge. This analysis demonstrates how argument mediates genre uptake and circulation. In doing so, it helps account for how technical and scientific genres circulate in contemporary online publics.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281620906150
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
  2. 10.1590/S1518-76322010000300002
  3. 10.7330/9781607324430.c001
  4. 10.1136/bmj.g1585
  5. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
  6. 10.1215/9780822376064
  7. 10.1111/comt.12088
  8. 10.7330/9781607324430.c003
  9. 10.1068/a37287
  10. 10.1007/BF00173966
  11. 10.1017/CBO9780511546013.003
  12. 10.26818/9780814213988
  13. 10.1080/17512786.2010.506060
  14. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  15. 10.5040/9780755694525
  16. 10.7330/9781607324430
  17. Schneider J., Samp K., Passant A., Decker S. (2013). Arguments about deletion: How experience improves the ac…
  18. 10.1145/344599.344646
  19. 10.7330/9781607324430.c009
  20. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →