Abstract

Digital technologies have dramatically changed the way scientists produce, circulate, and disseminate scientific knowledge. Here we investigate women scientists’ writing activity and digitally mediated discursive practices in their professions. Using survey techniques, we identify patterns of professional and public science communication online across the disciplines. We also explore the potentially interrelated genres—“genre systems”—that routinely enact typified rhetorical actions in their professional contexts. The findings show that their socioliterate activity fully reflects the importance that their professional contexts attach to certain “privileged” genres of professional communication (e.g., journal articles), despite the fact that the respondents value highly genres of socially responsible research (e.g., blogs, infographics). Statistical analyses further confirm that “disciplinary culture” is a determining factor in the extent to which respondents engage with collaborative genres and participatory science genres. We report significant differences in the use of digital mediation tools to communicate science online to both expert and lay audiences. Finally, we discuss several implications for writing pedagogy and the development of digital skills to support scientists, especially women, who want or need to promote and disseminate their research widely.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883251328307
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (41) · 8 in this index

  1. Abramo G. D’Angelo C. A. Di Costa F. (2019). A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: Evi…
  2. 10.1515/9783110220674.305
  3. Opening science. The evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaborati…
  4. Genre and the new rhetoric
  5. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analysing texts and textual practices
Show all 41 →
  1. Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions
  2. Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines
  3. Worlds of written discourse
  4. 10.1075/pbns.308.06bre
  5. Clemente-Gallardo J. Ferrer A. Íñiguez D. Rivero A. Ruiz G Tarancón A. (2019). Do researchers collaborate in …
  6. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches
  7. Finnemann N. O. (2016). Hypertext configurations: Genres in networked digital media. JASIST 68(4) 845–854. ht…
  8. Hyland K. (2018). Narrative identity and academic storytelling. ILCEA 31. http://doi.org/10.4000/ilcea.4677
  9. Kelly A. R. Maddalena K. (2016). Networks genres and complex wholes: Citizen science and how we act together …
  10. Kjellberg S. (2009). Scholarly blogging practice as situated genre an analytical framework based on genre the…
  11. (3) paper 410. Retrieved September 29 2024 from http://InformationR.net/ir/14-3/paper410.html
  12. Kwok R. (2018). Lab notebooks go digital. Nature 560 269–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05895-3
  13. Larivière V. Ni C. Gingras Y. Cronin B. Sugimoto C. R. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature 5…
  14. Lindenman H. (2015). Inventing metagenres: How four college seniors connect writing across domains. Compositi…
  15. Loroño-Leturiondo M. Davies S. R. (2018). Responsibility and science communication: Scientists’ experiences o…
  16. Written Communication
  17. Mauranen A. (2013). Hybridism edutainment and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of Eng…
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Written Communication
  20. Meibauer G. Phull K. Alejandro A. Ciflikli G. (2023). Alternative metrics traditional problems? Assessing gen…
  21. Orlikowski W. J. Yates J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizatio…
  22. 10.1075/pbns.308.09orp
  23. Pérez-Llantada C. (2021). Research genres across languages: Multilingual science communication online. Cambri…
  24. Written Communication
  25. Prior P. Hengst J. (2010). Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10…
  26. Written Communication
  27. Digital communication in scientific practices: Limitations and possibilities for equality
    Prisma Social
  28. Written Communication
  29. Thelwall M. Bailey C. Makita M. Sud P. Madalli D. P. (2019). Gender and research publishing in India: Uniform…
  30. Thelwall M. Bailey C. Tobin C. Bradshaw N. (2019). Gender differences in research areas methods and topics: C…
  31. Thibault R. T. Amaral O. B. Argolo F. Bandrowski A. E. Davidson A. R. Drude N. I. (2023). Open Science 2.0: T…
  32. Trachtenberg Z. M. Burns T. J. de Beurs K. Ellis S. E. Gates K. K. Kelly J. F. Randall A. R. Schlupp I. Soppe…
  33. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  34. Written Communication
  35. Yates J. Orlikowski W. J. (1992). Genres of organisational communication: A structurational approach to study…
  36. Collaborative genres for collaboration: Genre systems in digital media