Abstract

The research article is a staple genre in the economy of scientific research, and although research articles have received considerable treatment in genre scholarship, little attention has been given to the important development of Registered Reports. Registered Reports are an emerging, hybrid genre that proceeds through a two-stage model of peer review. This article charts the emergence of Registered Reports and explores how this new form intervenes in the evolution of the research article genre by replacing the central topoi of novelty with methodological rigor. Specifically, I investigate this discursive and publishing phenomenon by describing current conversations about challenges in replicating research studies, the rhetorical exigence those conversations create, and how Registered Reports respond to this exigence. Then, to better understand this emerging form, I present an empirical study of the genre itself by closely examining four articles published under the Registered Report model from the journal Royal Society Open Science and then investigating the genre hybridity by examining 32 protocols (Stage 1 Registered Reports) and 77 completed (Stage 2 Registered Reports) from a range of journals in the life and psychological sciences. Findings from this study suggest Registered Reports mark a notable intervention in the research article genre for life and psychological sciences, centering the reporting of science in serious methodological debates.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318804534
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 31 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/S2055-537720140000011009
  2. 10.1075/swll.9.02baz
  3. 10.1075/pbns.130.13bha
  4. 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
  5. 10.1111/add.12728
  6. 10.1515/9781400884940
  7. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
  8. 10.1093/oso/9780190465926.001.0001
  9. 10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
  10. 10.1080/00335637509383303
  11. Kelly [now Mehlenbacher] A. R., Kittle Autry M. (2013). Access, accommodation, and science: Knowledge in an “…
  12. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
  13. 10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938
  14. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  15. 10.1007/978-3-319-40295-6_1
  16. 10.1075/pbns.188.11mil
  17. 10.1108/00220410810844196
  18. 10.1038/s41562-016-0034
  19. 10.1177/1745691612459058
  20. 10.1126/science.aac4716
  21. 10.2307/2393771
  22. Paré A., Starke-Meyerring D., McAlpine L. (2009). The dissertation as a multi-genre: Many readers, many readi…
  23. 10.7554/eLife.12470
  24. Review History RSOS-160285.R0. (2016). The effects of exposure to objective coherence on perceived meaning in…
  25. Review History RSOS-160705. (2017). Subliminal influence on preferences? A test of evaluative conditioning fo…
  26. Review History RSOS-160868.R0. (2017). Global network centrality of university rankings (Weisi Guo, Marco Del…
  27. Review History RSOS-161043.R0. (2017). Radical framing effects in the ultimatum game: The impact of explicit …
  28. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  29. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00672
  30. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00442
  31. 10.1177/002194360203900102
CrossRef global citation count: 21 View in citation network →