Abstract

We report on a longitudinal case study (n = 9) about popularization writing skills in undergraduate interdisciplinary students. Writing skills were determined by analyzing components of the cognitive process model of writing proposed by Hayes. Keystroke logging and video observation were used to analyze the text construction process (the process level) in third-year writing. Genre knowledge (the control level) was analyzed through text analysis and assessment of first-year and third-year texts. Results showed that writing was highly individualized at the process level, including switches between processes, timing, number of edits, and reliance on the source text. At the control level, popularization genre knowledge did not significantly change over time and text quality remained low to average, suggesting a lack in genre knowledge. Choices in the writing process are, thus, not reflected in the quality of the writing product. These findings point to a need for explicit training in popularization discourse alongside academic discourse training.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883251349204
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (65) · 13 in this index

  1. 10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4_7
  2. 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.429
  3. Bankston A. McDowell G. S. (2018). Changing the culture of science communication training for junior scientis…
  4. Baram-Tsabari A. Lewenstein B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public co…
  5. Discourse in and through the media: Recontextualizing and reconceptualizing expert discourse
Show all 65 →
  1. The appliance of science: The challenges of undergraduate science writing popular science
    The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics
  2. Bray B. France B. Gilbert J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication…
  3. Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and gradu…
    Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education
  4. Brownell S. E. Price J. V. Steinman L. (2013b). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ p…
  5. Calsamiglia H. Van Dijk T. A. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse & So…
  6. Written Communication
  7. Ciapuscio G. E. (2003). Formulation and reformulation procedures in verbal interactions between experts and (…
  8. Crone W. C. Dunwoody S. L. Rediske R. K. Ackerman S. A. Zenner G. M. P. Yaros R. A. (2011). Informal science …
  9. Davies S. R. Franks S. Roche J. Schmidt A. L. Wells R. Zollo F. (2021). The landscape of European science com…
  10. Written Communication
  11. 10.1080/0047231X.2021.12290548
  12. Written Communication
  13. Druschke C. G. Karraker N. McWilliams S. R. Scott A. Morton-Aiken J. Reynolds D. Finan E. Lofgren I. E. (2022…
  14. Written Communication
  15. Cognitive processes in writing
  16. College Composition and Communication
  17. Giannoni D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. English for Specific Purposes 27(…
  18. Reformulation and recontextualisation in popularization discourse
    Ibérica
  19. Harrington E. R. Lofgren I. E. Gottschalk Druschke C. Karraker N. E. Reynolds N. McWilliams S. R. (2021). Tra…
  20. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications
  21. Written Communication
  22. Cognitive processes in writing
  23. Heath K. D. Bagley E. Berkey A. J. M. Birlenbach D. M. Carr-Markell M. K. Crawford J. W. Duennes M. Han J. Ha…
  24. Hyland K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of…
  25. Inputlog. (2021). Inputlog (Version version 8.0.0.17). https://www.inputlog.net/
  26. Kapon S. Ganiel U. Eylon B. S. (2010). Explaining the unexplainable: Translated scientific explanations (TSE)…
  27. Kuehne L. M. Twardochleb L. A. Fritschie K. J. Mims M. C. Lawrence D. J. Gibson P. P. Stewart-Koster B. Olde …
  28. LaRocca T. J. Justice J. N. Seals D. R. Martens C. R. (2016). Adding value to a graduate physiology seminar b…
  29. Outreach and engagement education for graduate students in natural resources: Developing …
    Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
  30. Written Communication
  31. Written Communication
  32. McKinnon M. Bryant C. (2017). Thirty years of a science communication course in Australia. Science Communicat…
  33. Mellor F. (2013). Twenty years of teaching science communication: A case study of imperial college’s master’s…
  34. Mercer-Mapstone L. D. Kuchel L. J. (2015). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resour…
  35. Mercer-Mapstone L. D. Kuchel L. J. (2016). Integrating communication skills into undergraduate science degree…
  36. Moni R. W. Hryciw D. H. Poronnik P. Moni K. B. (2007). Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience stud…
  37. Motta-Roth D. dos Santos Lovato C. (2009). Organização retórica do gênero notícia de popularização da ciência…
  38. Motta-Roth D. Scherer A. S. (2016). Science popularization: Interdiscursivity among science pedagogy and jour…
  39. Myrtille. (2021). Myrtille (Version version 2.9.2). https://www.myrtille.io/
  40. Journal of Writing Research
  41. Nwogu K. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre analysis approach to the schema of popularized…
  42. O’Keeffe K. Bain R. (2018). ComSciCon-triangle: Regional science communication training for graduate students…
  43. Parkinson J. Adendorff R. (2004). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. Englis…
  44. Pelger S. (2018). Popular science writing bringing new perspectives into science students’ theses. Internatio…
  45. Pelger S. Nilsson P. (2016). Popular science writing to support students’ learning of science and scientific …
  46. Petzold A. M. Dunba R. L. (2018). The art of talking about science: Beginning to teach physiology students ho…
  47. Poronnik P. Moni R. W. (2006). The opinion editorial: Teaching psychology outside the box. Advances in Psycho…
  48. Rakedzon T. Baram-Tsabari A. (2017a). Assessing and improving l2 graduate students’ popular science and acade…
  49. Assessing Writing
  50. Rubega M. A. Burgio K. R. MacDonald A. A. M. Oeldorf-Hirsch A. Capers R. S. Wyss R. (2020). Assessment by aud…
  51. 10.1007/978-3-031-28174-7
  52. Journal of Writing Research
  53. Van Hout T. Pander Maat H. De Preter W. (2011). Writing from news sources: The case of apple tv. Journal of P…
  54. Computers and Composition
  55. Journal of Writing Research
  56. 10.1163/9780080460932_008
  57. Expository science: Forms and functions of popularization. Sociology of the sciences a ye…
  58. Woods H. C. Scott H. (2016). #Sleepyteens: Social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep qual…
  59. Yeoman K. H. James H. A. Bowater L. (2011). Development and evaluation of an undergraduate science communicat…
  60. 10.24112/ajsotl.103127