Written Communication Jan 2020 OA PDF

Genre Knowledge and Writing Development: Results From the Writing Transfer Project

Dana Lynn Driscoll Indiana University of Pennsylvania ; Joseph Paszek University of Detroit Mercy ; Gwen Gorzelsky Colorado State University ; Carol L. Hayes ; Edmund Jones Seton Hall University

Abstract

Using a mixed-methods, multi-institutional design of general education writing courses at four institutions, this study examined genre as a key factor for understanding and promoting writing development. It thus aims to provide empirical validation of decades of theoretical work on and qualitative studies of genre and the nature of genre knowledge. While showing that both simplistic and nuanced genre knowledge promote writing development, our findings suggest that nuanced genre knowledge correlates with writing development over the course of a semester. Based on these findings, we propose an expanded view of Tardy’s four genre knowledge components and argue for their explanatory power. We recognize these genre components can be cultivated by using three particular strategies: writing for nonclassroom audiences, using source texts explicitly to join existing disciplinary conversations, and cultivating two types of metacognitive awareness (awareness of the writing strategies used to complete specific tasks and awareness of one’s levels of proficiency in particular types of writing knowledge). Findings can be used to enrich first-year or upper-division writing curricula in the areas of genre knowledge, audience awareness, and source use.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319882313
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze
Topics
transfer multimodality

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Sterk et al. (2025)
    Popularization Writing Skills Development: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Wri…
    Written Communication
  2. Rothschild et al. (2024)
    Disciplinarity and Transfer Ten Years Later: A Multi-Institutional Investigatio…
    College Composition and Communication
  3. Flores-Ferrés et al. (2024)
    Teachers’ Implementation of the Writing Curriculum in Grades 7-8 of Chilean Pub…
    Written Communication
  4. Messina et al. (2023)
    Prompting Reflection: Using Corpus Linguistic Methods in the Local Assessment o…
    Written Communication
  5. Lindenman (2022)
    Theorizing Writing Differently: How Community-Engaged Projects in First-Year Co…
    College Composition and Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Driscoll et al. (2022)
    Threshold Genres: A 10-Year Exploration of a Medical Writer’s Development and S…
    Written Communication
  2. Negretti (2021)
    Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: Areas of Convergence in Learning to W…
    Written Communication
  3. Ahmed (2021)
    “Helping Me Learn New Things Every Day”: The Power of Community College Student…
    Written Communication
  4. Tardy et al. (2020)
    Teaching and Researching Genre Knowledge: Toward an Enhanced Theoretical Framework
    Written Communication

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Troutman et al. (2015)
    I-BEAM:<i>Instance</i>Source Use and Research Writing Pedagogy
    Rhetoric Review
  2. Negretti (2012)
    Metacognition in Student Academic Writing
    Written Communication
  3. Reiff et al. (2011)
    Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotia…
    Written Communication
  4. Smagorinsky (2008)
    The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Resea…
    Written Communication
  5. Bizup (2008)
    BEAM: A Rhetorical Vocabulary for Teaching Research-Based Writing
    Rhetoric Review
Show all 11 →
  1. Downs et al. (2007)
    Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions:
    College Composition and Communication
  2. Carter (2007)
    Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines
    College Composition and Communication
  3. HASWELL (2000)
    Documenting Improvement in College Writing
    Written Communication
  4. RUSSELL (1997)
    Rethinking Genre in School and Society
    Written Communication
  5. HAAS (1994)
    Learning to Read Biology
    Written Communication
  6. Freedman (1993)
    Situating Genre: A Rejoinder
    Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001.
     ↗
  2. Bazerman C. (2013)
    A theory of literate action
     ↗
  3. Clark I. L. (2011)
    10.37514/WAC-J.2011.22.1.05
    WAC Journal  ↗
  4. 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
     ↗
  5. 10.4324/9780203812174
     ↗
  6. Gorzelsky G. (2016)
    Critical transitions: Writing and the question of transfer
     ↗
  7. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
     ↗
  8. 10.1080/00335638409383686
     ↗
  9. 10.1016/j.asw.2016.11.001
     ↗
  10. 10.1207/s15326985ep2402_1
     ↗
  11. 10.2307/4140684
     ↗
  12. 10.2307/j.ctt46nsh0
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 29 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Jan 2026
    Model as Missed Opportunity for Writing Transfer During Career Change ↗
    Jessica McCaughey
    transfer multimodality
  2. College Composition and Communication Dec 2025
    Writing Transfer beyond FYC ↗
    Ryan P. Shepherd
    first-year composition transfer empirical research multimodality multilingual writers
  3. Composition Forum Oct 2025
    Review of Multimodal Composing and Writing Transfer , edited by Kara Poe Alexander, Matthew Davis, Lilian W. Mina, and Ryan P. Shepherd ↗
    transfer multimodality multilingual writers
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    Multimodal Composing and Writing Transfer ↗
    Annalyse Granowski
    transfer multimodality
  5. Literacy in Composition Studies May 2025
    A Multimodal Composing and Writing Transfer edited by Kara Poe Alexander, Matthew Davis, Lillian W. Mina, and Ryan P. Shepherd ↗
    Kinney, Tiffany
    transfer multimodality