Abstract

What aspects of writing are doctoral students metacognitive about when they write research articles for publication? Contributing to the recent conversation about metacognition in genre pedagogy, this study adopts a qualitative approach to illustrate what students have in common, across disciplines and levels of expertise, and the dynamic interplay of genre knowledge and metacognition in learning to write for research. 24 doctoral students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) were recruited from subsequent runs of a genre-based writing course and were interviewed within a 2-year period when they submitted an article for publication, 3 to 11 months after course completion. Over time and across disciplines, doctoral students’ metacognition converges on four main themes: genre analysis as a “tool” to read and write, audience and the readers’ mind, rhetorical strategies, and the writing process. Furthermore, these themes are extensively combined in the students’ thinking, confirming conceptualizations of expertise as an integration of knowledge types. Metacognition of these themes invoked increased perceived confidence and control over writing, suggesting key areas where metacognitive intervention may be promising.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320984796
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 36 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bazerman C. (2018). What does a model model? And for whom? Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 301-318. https://…
  2. Beaufort A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Universit…
  3. Beaufort A., Iñesta A. (2014). Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In Jakobs E.M., Perrin D. …
  4. Carli G., Tagliaventi M. R., Cutolo D. (2018). One size does not fit all: The influence of individual and con…
  5. Casanave C. P. (2019). Performing expertise in doctoral dissertations: Thoughts on a fundamental dilemma faci…
  6. Cheng A. (2018). Genre and graduate level research writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.…
  7. Curry M. J., Lillis T. (2019). Unpacking the lore on multilingual scholars publishing in English: A discussio…
  8. Dunlosky J., Rawson K. (2019). How cognitive psychology can inform evidence-based education reform: An overvi…
  9. Dunning D., Johnson K., Ehrlinger J., Kruger J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. …
  10. Flavell J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. …
  11. Galbraith D., Baaijen V. M. (2018) The work of writing: Raiding the inarticulate. Educational Psychologist, 5…
  12. Gorzelsky G., Driscoll D. L., Paszek J., Jones E., Hayes C. (2016). Cultivating constructive metacognition: A…
  13. Hacker D. J. (2018). A metacognitive model of writing: An update from a developmental perspective. Educationa…
  14. 10.4324/9780203876428
  15. Karlen Y. (2017). The development of a new instrument to assess metacognitive strategy knowledge about academ…
  16. Kaufhold K., McGrath L. (2019). Revisiting the role of “discipline” in writing for publication in two social …
  17. Kellogg R. T., Whiteford A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Ed…
  18. Lee I., Mak P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TES…
  19. Lillis T. M., Turner J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional conc…
  20. Limpo T., Alves R. A. (2017). Relating beliefs in writing skill malleability to writing performance: The medi…
  21. McArthur C. A., Philippakos Z. A., Ianetta M. (2015). Self-regulated strategy instruction in college developm…
  22. McGrath L., Negretti R., Nicholls K. (2019). Hidden expectations: scaffolding subject specialists’ genre know…
  23. Miller C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167. https://doi.org/10.108…
  24. Negretti R., McGrath L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral r…
  25. Schraw G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1/2), 113-125. https:/…
  26. Schraw G., Moshman D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-373. https://doi.…
  27. Swales J. M. (2019). The futures of EAP genre studies: A personal viewpoint. Journal of English for Academic …
  28. Swales J. M., Feak C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. Michigan University Press. https://d…
  29. Tardy C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. ht…
  30. Tardy C. M., Whittig E. (2017). On the ethical treatment of EAL writers: An update. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 9…
  31. Wilson J. A., Soblo H. (2020). Transfer and transformation in multilingual student writing. Journal of Englis…
  32. Wingate U. (2016). Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. L…
  33. Winne P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 267-2…
  34. Winne P. H., Azevedo R. (2014). Metacognition. In Sawyer R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning …
  35. Yeh H. C. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writin…
  36. Zimmerman B. J., Kitsantas A. (1999). Acquiring writing revision skill: Shifting from process to outcome self…
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →