Learning to Write a Research Article: Ph.D. Students’ Transitions toward Disciplinary Writing Regulation

Research in the Teaching of English May 2013

Learning to Write a Research Article: Ph.D. Students’ Transitions toward Disciplinary Writing Regulation

Montserrat Castelló Universitat Ramon Llull ; Anna Iñesta Universitat Ramon Llull ; Mariona Corcelles Universitat Ramon Llull

Abstract

This paper presents a study designed from a socially situated and activity theory perspective aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of how Ph.D. students regulate their academic writing activity. Writing regulation is a complex activity of a highly situated and social nature, involving cyclical thought-action-emotion dynamics and the individual’s capacity to monitor his/her activity. The central purpose was to analyze how writing regulation takes place within the framework of an educational intervention, a seminar designed to help Ph.D. students write their first research articles. The seminar not only focused on teaching the discursive resources of disciplinary articles in psychology but also sought to develop students’ recognition of epistemic stances (ways of knowing) and identities (ways of being) of their academic and disciplinary communities. While doing this, the seminar also aimed at helping students overcome the contradictions they encountered as they constructed their identities as researchers and writers through writing. We collected data on seminar participants’ perceptions (through analyses of interviews, diaries, and in-class interaction) and practices (through analyses of successive drafts and peers’ and tutors’ text revisions). Contradictions represent a challenge for which the individual does not have a clear answer. Consequently, solutions need to be creative and often painful; that is, the individual needs to work out something qualitatively different from a mere combination of two competing forces. The unit of analysis was the “Regulation Episode,” defined as the sequences of discourse and/or action from which a contradiction may be inferred and which, in turn, lead to the implementation of innovative actions to solve. Results showed that contradictions regarding students’ conceptualizations of their texts—as artifacts-in-activity versus as end-products—and of their identities as disciplinary writers become visible through certain discursive manifestations such as “dilemmas” and “critical conflicts” (Engeström & Sannino, 2011). The development of students’ disciplinary writing identity was affected by their perceptions of peripheral participation in the disciplinary community and of contradictions between different communities. Two successful ways students resolved contradictions and regulated their writing activity were to redefine the output and consider the text as a tool to think; implementing these solutions resulted in substantial changes to drafts. These results might be used to design socioculturally oriented educational interventions and tools to help students develop as disciplinary writers.

Journal: Research in the Teaching of English
Published: 2013-05-01
DOI: 10.58680/rte201323634
Open Access: Closed
Topics: genre theory multimodality scientific writing multilingual writers revision affect and writing

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Castelló et al. (2021)

Post-PhD Researchers’ Trajectories and Networking: The Mediating Role of Writin…

Written Communication
Negretti (2021)

Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: Areas of Convergence in Learning to W…

Written Communication
Roderick (2019)

Self-Regulation and Rhetorical Problem Solving: How Graduate Students Adapt to …

Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 34 View in citation network →