Abstract

Research on writing and transfer has shown that writers who have sophisticated rhetorical knowledge are well equipped to adapt to new situations, yet less attention has been paid to how a writer’s adaptability is influenced by their writing processes. Drawing on Zimmerman’s sociocognitive theory of self-regulation, this study compared the writing processes taken up by graduate student writers composing a research proposal for their final project in a tutor-training practicum. Findings from process logs, interviews, and drafts differentiated self-regulation strategies associated with varying degrees of success. The more successful writers framed problems in terms of potential solutions, used problems to set goals, and reacted to problems by creating a narrative of progress; in contrast, less successful writers avoided problems or framed them as dead-ends. Compared to the less successful writers, the more successful writers concluded the project with robust knowledge about research proposal writing. These findings suggest that self-regulation strategies may be linked to an ability to develop rhetorical knowledge and practices in the face of challenging writing situations.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319843511
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (13)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Community Literacy Journal
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. Research in the Teaching of English
  8. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
  2. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.003
  3. Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process
  4. 10.2307/375768
  5. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003
  6. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
  7. 10.1145/1297144.1297168
  8. Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom
  9. 10.1177/1609406917734060
  10. 10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
  11. 10.1080/09523987.2012.738013
  12. 10.1177/0091552113484580
  13. 10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
  14. Threshold concepts and transformation learning
  15. 10.2307/1176006
  16. Perkins D. N., Salomon G. (2012). Knowledge to go: A motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educati…
  17. 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  18. 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90030-8
  19. 10.2307/4140684
  20. 10.37514/WAC-J.2014.25.1.03
    The WAC Journal, 25  
  21. 10.2307/j.ctt6wrr95
  22. 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
  23. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →