Patterns of Cognitive Self-Regulation of Adolescent Struggling Writers

Ilona de Milliano University of Amsterdam ; Amos van Gelderen University of Amsterdam ; Peter Sleegers University of Twente

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between patterns of cognitive self-regulatory activities and the quality of texts produced by adolescent struggling writers ( N = 51). A think-aloud study was conducted involving analyses of self-regulatory activities concerning planning, formulating, monitoring, revising, and evaluating. The study shows that the writing processes of adolescent struggling writers have much in common with “knowledge telling” as defined by Bereiter and Scardamalia (1987). Nevertheless, there are interesting differences among the individual patterns. First, it appears that adolescent struggling writers who put more effort in planning and formulation succeed in writing better texts than do their peers. Furthermore, self-regulation of these better-achieving writers is quite varied in comparison to the others. Therefore, it seems that within this group of struggling writers, self-regulation does make a difference for the quality of texts produced. Consequently, some recommendations can be made for the stimulation of diverse self-regulatory activities in writing education for this special group of students.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2012-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088312450275
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (42) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1023/A:1022185502996
  2. 2006 Alliance annual report
  3. Learning to write in our nation’s schools
  4. PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich
  5. The psychology of written composition
Show all 42 →
  1. Blok H. (1986). Essay rating by the comparison method. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch. 11(4), 169-176.
  2. 10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_1
  3. Schrijfprocessen en tekstkwaliteit. Een onderzoek naar het verband tussen schrijfprocesse…
  4. Written Communication
  5. 10.1207/sldrp1402_3
  6. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.448
  7. 10.1177/002221949202500303
  8. 10.2307/1511035
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00612.x
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.223
  11. Handbook of educational psychology
  12. 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
  13. Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools
  14. 10.1177/002221949302600404
  15. Handbook of metacognition in education
  16. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications
  17. Written Communication
  18. Cognitive processes in writing
  19. Ervaren deficiënties door havo en mbo-opleidingen in de basisbagage van vmbo’ers
  20. Basisvaardigheden taal in het voortgezet onderwijs. Resultaten van een inspectieonderzoek…
  21. Written Communication
  22. 10.3758/BF03197724
  23. Pedagogische Studiën
  24. Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging
  25. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7
  26. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology
  27. The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving kno…
  28. The science of writing: Theories, methods individual differences, and applications
  29. Metacognition in educational theory and practice
  30. Academic writing in a second language
  31. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003
  32. Knowing what to write
  33. Written Communication
  34. 10.1007/s10674-005-0332-z
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00612.x
  36. 10.1080/13562511003619961
  37. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0919