Abstract

This study investigates collaborative interdisciplinary research writing at a large public Western U.S. university through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and textual analyses. While 75% of faculty at this institution supported campuswide interdisciplinary initiatives, only 31% believed current institutional structures enhanced such work—a 44-percentage-point gap that our analysis suggests stemmed from five key obstacles to successful interdisciplinary writing: structural barriers, career concerns (particularly for pre-tenure faculty), disciplinary cultural differences, terminological conflicts, and divergent goals between faculty and administrators. Faculty in this study focused on immediate practical challenges and professional development, while administrators prioritize institutional transformation and structural change. The study concludes with recommendations relevant for universities with comparable resources and commitment to Writing Studies informed approaches, including revised tenure guidelines that explicitly value interdisciplinary contributions, dedicated funding mechanisms, facilitated networking opportunities, and targeted writing support programs. By addressing faculty’s practical needs and administrators’ strategic vision, institutions can create environments where collaborative boundary-crossing becomes not just possible but sustainable and rewarding.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
10.1177/07410883251410166
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.26530/OAPEN_459901
  2. Bergen N. Hudani A. Khan S. Montgomery N. D. O’Sullivan T. (2020). Practical considerations for establishing …
  3. Canton E. (2025). A portfolio approach to research funding. Research Policy 54(1) 105129. https://doi.org/10.…
  4. Cvitanovic C. Colvin R. M. Reynolds K. J. Platow M. J. (2020). Applying an organizational psychology model fo…
  5. Douard N. Samet A. Giakos G. Cavallucci D. (2025). Quantifying interdisciplinarity in scientific articles usi…
  6. Frietsch R. Gruber S. Bornmann L. (2025). The definition of highly cited researchers: The effect of different…
  7. 10.1353/book.40922
  8. Hendren K. Newcomer K. Pandey S. K. Smith M. Sumner N. (2023). How qualitative research methods can be levera…
  9. Heron M. Gravett K. Yakovchuk N. (2021). Publishing and flourishing: Writing for desire in higher education. …
  10. Jain N. (2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Quali…
  11. Kaufhold K. McGrath L. (2019). Revisiting the role of ‘discipline’ in writing for publication in two social s…
  12. 10.1080/00221546.2024.2301912
  13. Mengist W. Soromessa T. Legese G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysi…
  14. Mohamed Shaffril H. A. Samsuddin S. F. Abu Samah A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basi…
  15. Murphy L. (2023). The questionnaire surveying research method: Pros cons and best practices. ScienceOpen Prep…
  16. Natow R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative R…
  17. Newman J. (2024). Promoting interdisciplinary research collaboration: A systematic review a critical literatu…
  18. Pelikan K. Jeffery R. Roelcke T. (2021). ‘The time where the British took the lead is over’: Ethical aspects …
  19. Ramos-Vielba I. Bloch C. Thomas D. A. Povlsen R. E. Falkenberg M. L. Stage A. K. (2024). How can societally-t…
  20. Sauer P. C. Seuring S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide i…
  21. Siddaway A. P. Wood A. M. Hedges L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for condu…
  22. Snyder H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Busines…
  23. Vogel M. T. Abu-Rish Blakeney E. Willgerodt M. A. Odegard P. S. Johnson E. L. Shrader S. Liner D. Dyer C. A. …
  24. Walters B. B. (2024). Doing interdisciplinary environmental change research solo. Economic Botany 78(1) 4–14.…
  25. Wise B. van Luyn A. (2020). Not ‘all writing is creative writing’ and that’s OK: Inter/disciplinary collabora…
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →