Another Voice in the Room: Negotiating Authority in Multidisciplinary Writing Groups

Sara Wilder University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Scholarship has shown that writing groups are important sites of authority negotiation for student writers, yet little empirical research has examined how groups negotiate authority through conversation or how these negotiations influence students’ developing expertise. Drawing on observations and interviews of an undergraduate thesis and a graduate dissertation writing group, I use the concept of “presentification” to analyze conversational moments in which group members referenced advisors, “making present” advisor authority to influence group collaborations. Specifically, I analyze these moments to show how writing groups can serve as low-stakes communities in which students negotiate their emerging sense of authority. I found that whereas less experienced writers looked to advisors to solve writing problems and used advisor authority to stand in for disciplinary expertise, more experienced writers voiced advisor guidance to help pose writing problems and negotiate their own stance as disciplinary experts. This study thus theorizes one process through which student writers negotiate emerging authority across sites of literate practice and in collaboration with others who may not themselves be members of the same disciplinary community.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320986540
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Research in the Teaching of English

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aitchison C. (2010). Learning together to publish: Writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing. In Aitch…
  2. Aitchison C. (2014). Learning from multiple voices: Feedback and authority in doctoral writing groups. In Ait…
  3. Artemeva N. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. In …
  4. Benoit-Barné C., Cooren F. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification. Management Commu…
  5. Brooks-Gillies M., Garcia E. G., Manthey K. (2020). Making do by making space: Multidisciplinary graduate wri…
  6. Cooren F. (2008). The selection of agency as a rhetorical device: Opening up the scene of dialogue through ve…
  7. Cooren F., Brummans H. J. M., Charrieras D. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of M…
  8. Emerson R., Fretz R., Shaw L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.…
  9. 10.7771/2832-9414.1774
    Writing Center Journal  
  10. Lassig C. J., Dillon L. H., Diezmann C. M. (2013). Student or scholar? Transforming identities through a rese…
  11. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  12. Lovitts B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why. The Journal…
  13. Mackiewicz J., Thompson I. K. (2015). Talk about writing: The tutoring strategies of experienced writing cent…
  14. Paré A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In McAlpine L., Amundsen C. (…
  15. Paré A. (2014). Writing together for many reasons: Theoretical and historical perspectives. In Aitchison C., …
  16. Paré A., Stark-Meyerring D., McAlpine L. (2011). Knowledge and identity work in the supervision of doctoral s…
  17. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https…
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →