Disciplinarity and Literate Activity in Civil and Environmental Engineering: A Lifeworld Perspective

Sarah Durst University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

Too frequently, representations of disciplinary writing foreground static notions of knowledge creation and literate practice in science and engineering. Rooted in discourse community theory, such representations present normative tropes of scientific practice that background notions of disciplinarity and obscure people’s lived experience and practice. Drawing on a case study of one woman, a civil and environmental engineer, this article argues for a lifeworld perspective of disciplinary becoming: a perspective that foregrounds notions of disciplinarity, lived experience, and literate practices as constantly mobile and in flux. The study suggests, specifically, that the woman’s work as an engineer cannot be separated from the people with whom she works, or has worked, and that her development as a writer extends beyond typical accounts of disciplinary enculturation. The author concludes by offering implications of this research for studies of disciplinarity and school science.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319864897
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (42) · 4 in this index

  1. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science
  2. 10.2307/j.ctt4cgnk0
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. PRE/TEXT
  5. 10.1017/CBO9781316106372
    The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy  
Show all 42 →
  1. Writing games
  2. Writing as social action
  3. Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts
  4. 10.4018/jmbl.2009040101
  5. 10.2307/2095325
  6. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.004
  7. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power
  8. Natural histories of discourse
  9. 10.1007/978-94-6300-349-0
  10. Science observed: Perspectives of the social study of science
  11. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  13. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power
  14. 10.3102/0091732X07300046001
  15. 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
  16. 10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
  17. 10.1002/tea.21199
  18. Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge
  19. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas
  20. Next generation science standards: For states, by states
  21. 10.1017/S0047404500021023
  22. 10.7551/mitpress/7702.001.0001
  23. Written Communication
  24. Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy
  25. What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices
  26. Plenary presented at the NCTEAR 2016 Midwinter Conference
  27. Prior P. (2018). How do moments add up to lives: Trajectories of semiotic becoming vs. tales of school learni…
  28. 10.1163/9781780523873_003
  29. 10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.06
  30. Written Communication
  31. Expanding literate landscapes: Persons, practices, and sociohistoric perspectives of disc…
  32. 10.4324/9780203420065
  33. 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
  34. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.001
  35. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
  36. Research in the Teaching of English
  37. Wysocki R., Sheridan M. P. (Eds.). (2018). Making future matters. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digita…