Abstract

People communicate through language as well as visual embodied actions like gestures, yet audio remains the default recording technology in interview-based writing research. Given that texts and writing processes are understood to involve semiotic resources beyond language, interview talk should receive similar treatment. In this article, I synthesize research that examines how visual embodied actions reveal and construct embodied knowledge and stance, and I apply these lenses to my own study, showing how visual embodied actions are essential to understanding three writers’ experiences with particular writing styles. I conclude by discussing the benefits of videorecording for writing research, offering guidance on how video can help researchers explore the interview as a social practice, and suggesting ways to design the consent process with transparency and democratic practice in mind. Ultimately, this article serves as a guide for writing researchers who wish to challenge the audio default when conducting interviews.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319898864
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (86) · 13 in this index

  1. AKVIS. (2019a). AKVIS Sketch. https://akvis.com/en/sketch/index.php
  2. AKVIS. (2019b). AKVIS Sketch Video. https://akvis.com/en/sketch-video/index.php
  3. Antaki C. (2017). An introduction to conversation analysis. http://ca-tutorials.lboro.ac.uk/sitemenu.htm
  4. 10.3726/978-1-4539-0869-3
  5. Berry P. W., Hawisher G. E., Selfe C. L. (2012). Transnational literate lives in digital times. Computers and…
Show all 86 →
  1. 10.1080/13645579.2011.563616
  2. 10.1017/S0047404500012744
  3. Becoming a writing researcher
  4. 10.1080/13668250802688306
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511810237
  6. 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
  7. 10.1177/1461445607082580
  8. 10.1177/1461445605054407
  9. 10.1080/01596306.2015.1105788
  10. Written Communication
  11. Composition Studies
  12. 10.1177/1077800417727765
  13. Written Communication
  14. Literacy in Composition Studies
  15. Derry S. J. (Ed.). (2007). Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel. …
  16. 10.1080/10508400903452884
  17. Writing in nonacademic settings
  18. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
  19. Written Communication
  20. Handbook of complementary methods in education research
  21. Metaphor and writing: Figurative thought in the discourse of written communication
  22. 10.1177/1470357206060917
  23. 10.1075/pbns.92
  24. Gonzales L. (2015). Multimodality, translingualism, and rhetorical genre studies. Composition Forum, 31. http…
  25. 10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01056.x
  26. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  27. Strategies for writing center research
  28. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  29. 10.14318/hau6.2.009
  30. 10.4135/9781526435385
  31. Hengst J. A. (2001). Collaborating on reference: A study of discourse and aphasia [Unpublished doctoral disse…
  32. 10.1057/9780230250628_5
  33. 10.4135/9781473920460
  34. Moving ideas: Multimodality and embodied learning in communities and schools
  35. A research primer for technical communication: Methods, exemplars, and analyses
  36. Inquirium LLC. (2018). InqScribe: Digital media transcription software. https://www.inqscribe.com/
  37. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
  38. Jamal F. (2016, June 30). The ugly side of shade culture. https://fatimajamal.com/blog/2018/12/12/the-ugly-si…
  39. Research in technical communication
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
  41. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
  42. Researching writing: An introduction to research methods
  43. 10.1075/hoph.7.13kro
  44. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
  45. Written Communication
  46. College Composition and Communication
  47. 10.1057/9781137353368
  48. MAXQDA. (2018). How to analyze videos with MAXQDA: Easy 5 step guide—Christmas edition! https://www.maxqda.co…
  49. Micciche L., Rule H. J., Stratman L. (2012). Multimodality, performance, and teacher-training. Computers and …
  50. Written Communication
  51. 10.1075/jnlh.1.4.01rep
  52. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
  53. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
  54. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.015
  55. Developmental pragmatics
  56. Research on writing: Principles and methods
  57. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001
  58. Research in the Teaching of English
  59. Rhetoric Review
  60. Olinger A. R. (2019). Self-contradiction in talk about writing: Making and unmaking autonomous models of lite…
  61. Research strategies in technical communication
  62. Handbook of interview research: Context and method
  63. Price M., Kerschbaum S. L. (2016). Stories of methodology: Interviewing sideways, crooked and crip. Canadian …
  64. What writing does and how it does it
  65. 10.1057/9780230250628_9
  66. 10.1057/9780230250628_1
  67. 10.1515/9783110220674.31
  68. Roozen K., Erickson J. (2017). Expanding literate landscapes: Persons, practices, and sociohistoric perspecti…
  69. Composition Studies
  70. Sano-Franchini J., Sackey D., Pigg S. (2011). Methodological dwellings: A search for feminisms in rhetoric & …
  71. The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments
  72. Scenters-Zapico J. (2010). Generaciones’ narratives: The pursuit & practice of traditional & electronic liter…
  73. Schegloff E. (n.d.). Transcript symbols for conversation analysis. http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/sch…
  74. 10.1075/gs.2
  75. 10.1093/applin/amq027
  76. Written Communication
  77. Computers and Composition
  78. VanKooten C. (2013). Toward a rhetorically sensitive model for new media composition. In McKee H. A., DeVoss …
  79. 10.1353/jlc.0.0032
  80. 10.4135/9781446201039.n11
  81. Written Communication