Abstract

People communicate through language as well as visual embodied actions like gestures, yet audio remains the default recording technology in interview-based writing research. Given that texts and writing processes are understood to involve semiotic resources beyond language, interview talk should receive similar treatment. In this article, I synthesize research that examines how visual embodied actions reveal and construct embodied knowledge and stance, and I apply these lenses to my own study, showing how visual embodied actions are essential to understanding three writers’ experiences with particular writing styles. I conclude by discussing the benefits of videorecording for writing research, offering guidance on how video can help researchers explore the interview as a social practice, and suggesting ways to design the consent process with transparency and democratic practice in mind. Ultimately, this article serves as a guide for writing researchers who wish to challenge the audio default when conducting interviews.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319898864
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 12 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.3726/978-1-4539-0869-3
  2. 10.1080/13645579.2011.563616
  3. 10.1017/S0047404500012744
  4. 10.1080/13668250802688306
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511810237
  6. 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
  7. 10.1177/1461445607082580
  8. 10.1177/1461445605054407
  9. 10.1080/01596306.2015.1105788
  10. 10.1177/1077800417727765
  11. Davis S. E. (2019). Shade: Literacy narratives as Black gay pride. Literacy in Composition Studies, 7(2), 56–…
  12. 10.1080/10508400903452884
  13. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
  14. 10.1177/1470357206060917
  15. 10.1075/pbns.92
  16. 10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01056.x
  17. 10.1057/9781137030825_2
  18. 10.14318/hau6.2.009
  19. 10.4135/9781526435385
  20. 10.1057/9780230250628_5
  21. 10.4135/9781473920460
  22. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
  23. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
  24. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
  25. 10.1075/hoph.7.13kro
  26. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
  27. 10.1057/9781137353368
  28. 10.1075/jnlh.1.4.01rep
  29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
  30. 10.1111/josl.1_12177
  31. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.015
  32. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001
  33. Price M., Kerschbaum S. L. (2016). Stories of methodology: Interviewing sideways, crooked and crip. Canadian …
  34. 10.1057/9780230250628_9
  35. 10.1057/9780230250628_1
  36. 10.1515/9783110220674.31
  37. 10.1075/gs.2
  38. 10.1093/applin/amq027
  39. 10.1353/jlc.0.0032
  40. 10.4135/9781446201039.n11
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →