Abstract

Resulting from stroke or brain injury, aphasia affects individuals’ ability to produce and comprehend language, but it also creates profound social changes, limiting individuals’ opportunities to communicate or to be seen as capable of communication. To address these challenges, the field of communicative sciences and disorders (CSD) has sought to ensure “communicative access” by reducing barriers to communication. This article, through an analysis of the communicative practices of participants in a memoir group for people with aphasia, develops a nuanced conception of communicative access as a process of negotiation across individuals and modes and not just as a process of reducing barriers. The study shows, specifically, that rather than the mere presence of multiple semiotic resources enabling communicative access, individuals enact access by flexibly shifting between modes to take advantage of various kinds of affordances that best suit their needs. This willingness to use modes in atypical or nonnormative ways importantly challenges the very idea of “normal” communication. The theory of communicative access developed in this article melds (a) a CSD understanding of communication as social and tied inextricably to identity with (b) a disability studies conception of access as an ongoing, negotiated process and with (c) a writing studies emphasis on literate, communicative activity as complexly layered, distributed, negotiated, and (multi)semiotic.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318823210
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College English

References (59) · 7 in this index

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2018). Aphasia. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecifi…
  3. 10.1080/02687030544000128
  4. College English
  5. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Show all 59 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Disability in the teaching of writing: A critical sourcebook
  3. Disability rhetoric
  4. 10.3998/mpub.9708722
  5. Dunn P., Dunn De Mers K. (2002). Reversing notions of disability and accommodation: Embracing universal desig…
  6. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
  7. Goodwin C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Ant…
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Hamraie A. (2013). Designing collective access: A feminist disability theory of universal design. Disability …
  10. Until we are strong together: Women writers in the Tenderloin
  11. 10.1057/9780230250628_5
  12. Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text
  13. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal
  14. 10.1080/02687039808249578
  15. 10.1080/02687039808249575
  16. Kagan A., Shumway E., Podolsky L. (2010). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Why and how? Americ…
  17. Pictographic communication resources
  18. Kerschbaum S. (2013). Modality. Multimodality in motion: Disability and kairotic spaces. Kairos: A Journal of…
  19. Research in the Teaching of English
  20. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
  21. 10.2511/rpsd.26.1.1
  22. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication
  23. Written Communication
  24. Written Communication
  25. Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy
  26. Writing groups inside and outside the classroom
  27. National Aphasia Association. (2016). The NAA Aphasia Awareness Survey. Retrieved from https://www.aphasia.or…
  28. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2015). Aphasia. Retrieved from https://www…
  29. Oswal S. K. (2013). Ableism. Multimodality in motion: Disability and kairotic spaces. Kairos: A Journal of Rh…
  30. 10.1080/02687039508248197
  31. 10.1080/02687039808249579
  32. Talking about aphasia: Living with loss of language after stroke
  33. Practicing research in writing studies: Reflexive and ethically responsible research
  34. Literacy, economy, and power: Writing and research after Literacy in American lives
  35. 10.1057/9780230250628
  36. 10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.06
  37. 10.1515/9783110220674.31
  38. Rhetorical listening: Identification, gender, whiteness
  39. Geographies of writing: Inhabiting places and encountering difference
  40. 10.1080/02687930444000697
  41. 10.1097/00011363-200407000-00005
  42. 10.1097/01.TLD.0000299887.24241.39
  43. 10.3998/mpub.309723
  44. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders
  45. 10.1080/13682820701437245
  46. 10.3102/00346543071001133
  47. 10.1177/030802260306600403
  48. The wealth of reality: An ecology of composition
  49. The question of access: Disability, space, meaning
  50. 10.1515/9780804773720
  51. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge
  52. Written Communication
  53. Yergeau M., Brewer E., Kerschbaum S. L., Oswal S., Price M., Salvo M. Howes F. (2013). Multimodality in motio…
  54. Zdenek S. (2009). Accessible podcasting: College students on the margins in the new media classroom. Computer…