Abstract

In the past decades, the notion of voice in the theorizing and teaching of academic writing has been the subject of much debate and conceptual change, especially concerning its relation to writer identity. Many newer accounts of voice and identity in academic writing draw on the dialogical concept of voice by Bakhtin. However, some theoretical and methodological inconsistencies have surfaced in the adaptions of the concept. Working from a refinement of the dialogical notion of voice based on the concepts of polyphony and interiorization, this article presents a methodological approach for analyzing voice(s) in writing. The article presents material around the evolution of an early-career researcher’s dissertation synopsis. The material is multilayered, including the writer’s text, transcripts from an interdisciplinary peer-feedback conversation with two colleagues, and a video-stimulated interview with the writer. Excerpts of the material were analyzed to trace the polyphony of interiorized voices that influenced the writing. This focus revealed the multivoicedness of academic texts as an effect of their history of coming into being. This article contributes to the question of voice and identity in academic writing from a dialogical psycholinguistic perspective by presenting a de-reifying notion of voice grounded in an understanding of writing as a polyphonic activity, which also feeds into the formation of a writer’s self.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883231207104
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
  2. 10.1007/s12124-007-9041-8
  3. 10.1177/0959354314534334
  4. 10.1017/9781108755146.010
  5. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.12.001
  6. 10.1075/fos.25
  7. 10.1163/9781780523873_011
  8. 10.1163/9781780523873_012
  9. 10.2307/374447
  10. 10.2307/j.ctt4cgrgw
  11. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  12. 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl
  13. 10.1075/swll.5
  14. 10.1177/0959354314541020
  15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02355
  16. 10.7146/ocps.v15i2.16831
  17. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
  18. 10.1017/S0267190514000178
  19. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
  20. 10.1163/9781780523873_004
  21. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001
  22. 10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4
  23. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00037-0
  24. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
  25. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006
  26. 10.1057/9781137030825_3
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →