A Sociocultural Approach to Style

Andrea R. Olinger University of Louisville Hospital

Abstract

Common definitions of style have tended to treat it as an artifact controlled by the producer, overlooking two features afforded attention in sociocultural linguistics: dynamism and co-construction. Although some scholars have highlighted style’s interactivity, their accounts have not yielded a comprehensive theory. This essay advances and illustrates a more rigorous definition of style as a fluid activity in which meaning is often contested, continually negotiated, and necessarily informed by interlocutors’ beliefs. Ultimately, in integrating and expanding on theories of style’s interactivity and contingency, it provides guidance for style researchers and demonstrates the value of cross-disciplinary conversation around style.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2016-04-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2016.1142930
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00382.x
  2. 10.1177/1461445605054407
  3. Out of Style: Reanimating Stylistic Study in Composition and Rhetoric
  4. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.001
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
  6. The Centrality of Style
  7. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828
  8. Eckert, Penelope. “Variation and the Indexical Field.”Journal of Sociolinguistics12.4 (2008): 453–76.
  9. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199782505.001.0001
  10. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764129.001.0001
  11. The Centrality of Style
  12. 10.1075/hoph.7.13kro
  13. Matsuda, Paul Kei. “Identity in Written Discourse.”Annual Review of Applied Linguistics35 (2015): 140–59.
  14. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
  15. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
  16. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.001
  17. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00037-0
  18. 10.1057/9781137030825.0009
  19. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →