Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Background:</i></b> Responding to current research gaps in the investigation of researcher identity development among graduate students, we implement a longitudinal study, powered by user-experience (UX) methods, to document engineering doctoral students’ identity formation. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Literature review:</i></b> Identity formation in novice engineering researchers, such as doctoral students remains underexamined. A process-oriented approach to studying researchers’ identity development may yield useful theoretical and programmatic insights. UX methods offer visual and qualitative approaches to the understanding of student experiences by revealing their identity formation journey over time. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Research questions:</i></b> 1. How can UX methods like persona building support studies of researcher identity development? 2. How can the insights generated from longitudinal UX methods inform graduate program design and assessment? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Methodology:</i></b> Twenty participants were recruited from an industrial engineering department at an R1 university. Data were collected via surveys, qualitative interviews, and journey mapping. Analysis methods, informed by a phenomenological perspective, included persona building and collaborative affinity diagramming. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Results:</i></b> Seven distinctive personas were created to represent identity formation experiences influenced by learning modality, attitude, program stage, and prior experience. Theoretical conclusions and opportunities for academic programming emerged from affinity diagrams. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Doctoral engineering students’ researcher identity formation presented implications for theory and curricular design. UX methods offered benefits to qualitative research that can support cross-disciplinary efforts.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3586424
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (16)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 16 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  11. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/9781118504871
  2. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
  3. 10.3102/0091732X025001099
  4. 10.37514/tpc-b.2022.1367.2.02
  5. 10.4324/9781315538747
  6. 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757711
  7. 10.1109/te.2019.2901777
  8. 10.1002/jee.20427
  9. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664
  10. 10.1002/tea.21736
  11. 10.1080/03075079.2014.915301
  12. 10.18260/1-2--20543
  13. 10.18260/1-2--37888
  14. 10.1002/jee.20185
  15. 10.1108/SGPE-08-2019-0072
  16. 10.5195/ie.2020.92
  17. 10.17763/haer.79.1.wr25486891279345
  18. 10.4324/9781315023489
  19. 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2
  20. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00030.x
  21. 10.18260/p.26122
  22. 10.18260/1-2--36580
  23. 10.1080/03075079.2013.777402
  24. Exploring hypotheses regarding engineering graduate students identities, motivations, and…
  25. 10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028414
  26. 10.18260/1-2--29006
  27. 10.1109/icalt.2010.215
  28. 10.4324/9781003274414
  29. 10.1109/2.241424
  30. 10.1145/3491102.3517589
  31. 10.1007/978-1-4842-3867-7_5
  32. 10.1007/978-3-319-20898-5_7
  33. 10.1145/1463160.1463214
  34. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102583
  35. 10.18260/1-2--42282
  36. 10.1080/03043797.2023.2268023
  37. 10.1109/procomm57838.2023.00007
  38. 10.18260/1-2--45381
  39. 10.21872/2024IISE_7712
  40. 10.1145/3233756.3233931