Longitudinal Study of Usability and User Experience in Technical and Professional Communication Research

Erin Friess University of North Texas ; Christina Liles Southwest Airlines (United States)

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> While usability/user experience (UX) has a long and intertwined history with technical and professional communication (TPC), it is unknown how usability/UX is reflected within TPC research and how that reflection has shifted over time. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review:</b> Prior studies on the role of usability/UX in TPC have found that usability/UX appears infrequently in TPC research and curriculum requirements. However, usability/UX remains a routinely referenced core identity of TPC. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. To what degree is usability/UX studied in TPC scholarly journals? 2. When TPC researchers study usability/UX, what are they studying? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methodology:</b> A database of TPC-based usability/UX articles was collected through a defined search method. Articles were coded for primary or secondary emphasis on usability/UX, contribution to TPC, object of analysis, method of data collection, and major takeaway. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> Less than 8% of the total publications in the field are tied to usability/UX, though the percentage has increased in the most recent timeframe (2020–2022). Publications are shifting from research that expands usability/UX knowledge to research that uses usability/UX to explain TPC phenomena. In addition, the object of analysis has shifted to process-centric analysis, design thinking has become an increasing component of TPC usability/UX research, and over a quarter of the research on usability/UX provided did not provide enough methodological description to enable replicability. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> Although usability/UX has been consistently published in the TPC research journals, the amount of research suggests that usability/UX is not core to TPC's field identity.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2023.3314250
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. Written Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/IPCC.2013.6623941
  2. 10.1155/2017/6787504
  3. 10.1007/s40692-017-0093-6
  4. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981892
  5. 10.1109/MCOM.001.1800876
  6. 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102932
  7. 10.1055/s-0039-1677907
  8. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018
  9. 10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2
  10. 10.1063/1.5055496
  11. 10.1177/0734282916669246
  12. 10.3844/jcssp.2013.1443.1450
  13. 10.1089/tmj.2016.0178
  14. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636116
  15. 10.1145/1978942.1979336
  16. 10.1109/ipcc.2017.8013953
  17. 10.1111/drev.10239
  18. 10.1145/3194313
  19. 10.1080/14606925.2019.1652531
  20. 10.1145/357442.357443
  21. 10.1145/3166.3170