Identifying Commonalities and Divergences Between Technical Communication Scholarly and Trade Publications (1996–2017)

Journal of Business and Technical Communication Oct 2021

Identifying Commonalities and Divergences Between Technical Communication Scholarly and Trade Publications (1996–2017)

Erin Friess University of North Texas ; Ryan K Boettger

Abstract

More than 20 years ago, Elizabeth O. Smith published her points of reference that documented the research trajectory of technical communication from 1988 to 1997. Her results indicated a focus on rhetorical analyses, a decrease in collaborative research, and a disproportionate representation of male authors. This study builds on these points with a quantitative content analysis of 1,271 articles that were published in five leading technical communication journals and Intercom, the trade magazine for the Society for Technical Communication, from 1996 to 2017. The results show that both the research journals and Intercom have pivoted to process-driven rather than product-driven content. The results also suggest that the primary topics of communication strategy and collaboration might be the most likely places to foster future industry–academic ties and that the greatest division between the two populations is the primary topic of rhetoric. This study offers an updated baseline for future investigations by offering an evaluation of disparate content foci between the publication types.

Journal: Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published: 2021-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/10506519211021468
Open Access: Closed
Topics: technical communication

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Hunter (2024)

Toward TPC-UX: UX Topics in TPC Journals 2013–2022

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Berger et al. (2023)

Peer-Led Professional Development: How One Technical Communication Team Learns …

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (16)

Meloncon et al. (2019)

Empirical Research in Technical and Professional Communication: A 5-Year Examin…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Batova (2018)

Work Motivation in the Rhetoric of Component Content Management

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Kimball (2017)

The Golden Age of Technical Communication

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
St.Amant et al. (2016)

Addressing the Incommensurable

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Kynell et al. (2009)

The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing: The Emergence of Professional…

Technical Communication Quarterly

Show all 16 →

Paretti et al. (2007)

Teaching Technical Communication in an Era of Distributed Work: A Case Study of…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Blakeslee et al. (2004)

The State of Research in Technical Communication

Technical Communication Quarterly
(2003)

Editor’s Column

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Breuch (2002)

Thinking Critically about Technological Literacy: Developing a Framework to Gui…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Smith (2000)

Points of reference in technical communication scholarship

Technical Communication Quarterly
Smith (2000)

Strength in the Technical Communication Journals and Diversity in the Serials Cited

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
MOORE (1996)

Instrumental Discourse is as Humanistic as Rhetoric

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Allen (1990)

The Case Against Defining Technical Writing

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Roberts (1989)

Readers' Comprehension Responses in Informative Discourse: Toward Connecting Re…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Farkas (1985)

The Concept of Consistency in Writing and Editing

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Ramsey (1980)

Grammatical Voice and Person in Technical Writing: Results of a Survey

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓

Andersen R.

Increasing the value and accessibility of academic research: Perspectives from industry […

↗
10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020398

↗
10.1109/TPC.2013.2287570

↗
10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450

↗
10.1109/TPC.2007.908718

↗
10.1080/13501763.2014.936483

↗
10.1109/TPC.2011.2173228

↗
10.1109/TPC.2016.2537080

↗
10.2190/NETC11

↗
10.1177/1046496494254008

↗
10.4324/9780429201141

↗
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.005

↗
10.1353/bh.2014.0005

↗
10.1109/TPC.2014.2363892

↗
10.1109/TPC.2007.908733

↗
10.1109/TPC.1985.6448866

↗
10.1515/libr.1992.42.1.35

↗
10.1177/108056999105400203

↗
10.1109/47.31626

↗
10.1111/cccr.12019

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →