Abstract

More than 20 years ago, Elizabeth O. Smith published her points of reference that documented the research trajectory of technical communication from 1988 to 1997. Her results indicated a focus on rhetorical analyses, a decrease in collaborative research, and a disproportionate representation of male authors. This study builds on these points with a quantitative content analysis of 1,271 articles that were published in five leading technical communication journals and Intercom, the trade magazine for the Society for Technical Communication, from 1996 to 2017. The results show that both the research journals and Intercom have pivoted to process-driven rather than product-driven content. The results also suggest that the primary topics of communication strategy and collaboration might be the most likely places to foster future industry–academic ties and that the greatest division between the two populations is the primary topic of rhetoric. This study offers an updated baseline for future investigations by offering an evaluation of disparate content foci between the publication types.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2021-10-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519211021468
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (16)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 16 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  10. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓
  1. Increasing the value and accessibility of academic research: Perspectives from industry […
  2. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020398
  3. 10.1109/TPC.2013.2287570
  4. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2007.908718
  6. 10.1080/13501763.2014.936483
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2011.2173228
  8. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2537080
  9. 10.2190/NETC11
  10. 10.1177/1046496494254008
  11. 10.4324/9780429201141
  12. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.005
  13. 10.1353/bh.2014.0005
  14. 10.1109/TPC.2014.2363892
  15. 10.1109/TPC.2007.908733
  16. 10.1109/TPC.1985.6448866
  17. 10.1515/libr.1992.42.1.35
  18. 10.1177/108056999105400203
  19. 10.1109/47.31626
  20. 10.1111/cccr.12019
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →