Work Motivation in the Rhetoric of Component Content Management

Tatiana Batova Arizona State University

Abstract

This article describes a 12-month qualitative study that analyzes how a company’s transition to component content management (CCM)—a set of methodologies, processes, and technologies that allows working with texts as small components rather than complete, static documents—influences the work motivation of its technical communicators. The analysis is based on actor-network theory and the theories of work motivation from economics. When technical communicators felt that CCM’s only focus was efficiency and savings and that they were not recognized and connected to the fruits of their labor, their motivation decreased. But their motivation increased when they were engaged in job crafting—reshaping their understanding of the fruits of their labor and gaining recognition through prosocial behavior.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651918762030
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. College English

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 43 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
  3. 10.1109/TPC.2014.2342336
  4. 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.01.004
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2516642
  6. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0497
  7. 10.1002/job.68
  8. 10.5465/amr.1977.4281861
  9. 10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_2
  10. 10.1145/584955.584959
  11. 10.1145/1297144.1297147
  12. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2537080
  13. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2516618
  14. 10.1002/job.322
  15. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2516638
  16. 10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
  17. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
  18. 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
  19. 10.5465/19416520903047327
  20. 10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
  21. 10.1006/obhd.1999.2826
  22. 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.002
  23. 10.1002/job.625
  24. 10.2307/800624
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03480.x
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1987.tb00015.x
  27. 10.1007/BF01059830
  28. 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00011-6
  29. 10.2307/3069390
  30. 10.3102/0013189X031007003
  31. 10.5465/amr.2006.22527470
  32. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199612)17:1+<515::AID-JOB821>3.0.CO;2-G
  33. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  34. 10.1177/001872679004300402
  35. 10.2190/CPIC3
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  37. 10.2307/20159049
  38. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
  39. 10.2307/30040748
  40. 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
  41. 10.4018/jantti.2009010102
  42. 10.1145/584731.584733
  43. 10.2307/259118
CrossRef global citation count: 27 View in citation network →