Abstract

A recent British national intelligence-based Assessment (2002) illustrates how one government agency communicated science to serve its policy goals. This article analyzes some of the values that drive science, public policy, and national intelligence, and traces how those values affected the Assessment writers' goals and communication strategies. Through close reading of the Assessment's foreword and first section, this study shows how the writers shaped scientific and technical information to satisfy their disciplines' values and to naturalize their “proper perspective” on the policy case. Further analysis of similar documents will extend current research on scientific rhetoric, multidisciplinary collaborative writing, and public communication.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2009-01-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.39.1.b
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.5871/bacad/9780197263297.001.0001
  2. 10.2307/375964
  3. 10.1046/j.1440-1800.1999.00027.x
  4. 10.1177/108056999605900210
  5. 10.1080/00335638809383825
  6. 10.1080/02691720050199243
  7. 10.1162/15263810360661435
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511521737
  9. 10.1080/1470243032000214250
  10. 10.1080/02684520412331306390
  11. 10.1177/0021943604271958
  12. 10.4324/9781410606815
  13. 10.1353/book4677
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →