User Experience Methods in Research and Practice

Candice Lanius University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Ryan Weber University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Joy Robinson Northrop Grumman (United States)

Abstract

User experience (UX) researchers in technical communication (TC) and beyond still need a clear picture of the methods used to measure and evaluate UX. This article charts current UX methods through a systematic literature review of recent publications (2016–2018) and a survey of 52 UX practitioners in academia and industry. Our results indicate that contemporary UX research favors mixed methods, and that usability testing is especially popular in both published research and our survey results. This article presents these findings as a snapshot of contemporary research methods for UX.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2021-10-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816211044499
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 38 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1145/1978942.1979336
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2013.2287570
  3. 10.1145/1978942.1979270
  4. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052859
  5. 10.1561/1100000025
  6. 10.1145/3025453.3025739
  7. 10.1145/1013115.1013152
  8. 10.1145/2824893.2824914
  9. 10.4018/IJHCITP.2018010105
  10. 10.1145/2858036.2858410
  11. Gross A., Bongartz S. (2012). Why do I like it? Investigating the product-specificity of user experience. In …
  12. 10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_19
  13. 10.1080/01449290500330331
  14. 10.1145/2380718.2380736
  15. 10.1145/2468356.2468726
  16. 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1035335
  17. 10.1177/1420326X12469733
  18. Kim S. J. J. (2012). User study trends in augmented reality. In Proceedings of 2012 International Symposium o…
  19. 10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_23
  20. 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1701_8
  21. 10.1145/2971485.2971501
  22. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.048
  23. Law E. L., Roto V., Hazzenzahl M. (2009). Understanding, scoping, and defining user experience: A survey appr…
  24. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006
  25. 10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_42
  26. Marcus A. (Eds.). (2016). Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Methods. DUXU 2016. Lec…
  27. 10.1145/1047671.1047677
  28. 10.3390/app7040401
  29. 10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_14
  30. 10.1145/3233756.3233930
  31. 10.1145/3188173.3188175
  32. 10.1109/47.44537
  33. 10.1080/07370024.2017.1298038
  34. 10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_49
  35. 10.1145/1868914.1868973
  36. 10.1145/503376.503460
  37. Williams S. D. (2007). User experience design for technical communication: Expanding our notions of quality i…
  38. 10.1109/TSE.2016.2638427
CrossRef global citation count: 24 View in citation network →