Introducing Engineering Students to Standards and Regulatory Research and Writing

Lauren Kuryloski University at Buffalo, State University of New York ; Erin Rowley University at Buffalo, State University of New York ; Kristen R. Moore

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> This teaching case provides readers with a fully articulated teaching case that prepares students in engineering to communicate with and about standards. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> We use the ASTM standards database to train students to read and engage with research in regulatory documents. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> By situating this standards research within an emergent case study, students are introduced to additional constraints for writing as an engineer, including budgetary constraints, slide decks, and summary documents. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods:</b> We assess the case study through student self-report data and provide readers with recommendations for applying this case study in their own programs and classrooms. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results/discussion:</b> Students who engaged in the standards project reported that they were able to connect their assigned work to their futures as engineers. They also reported an increase in their understanding of how to read and research using standards. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> Standards and other forms of regulatory writing are an important part of daily literacy practices for working engineers; introducing them as a part of required engineering communication courses can augment our current practices in STEM communication.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2024-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2024.3356759
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (31) · 5 in this index

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2020-2021
  3. Its not my job to teach writing: Activity theory analysis of [invisible] writing practice…
    J. Acad. Lang. Learn.
  4. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241
  5. 10.18260/1-2--37023
Show all 31 →
  1. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020366
  2. 10.1201/9781003066460
  3. 10.4018/jitsr.2010120701
  4. 10.18260/p.26005
  5. 10.18260/1-2--5204
  6. 10.18260/p.25068
  7. 10.1177/096100060103300402
  8. 10.1080/0194262x.2012.648104
  9. 10.29173/istl1548
  10. Communication by Engineers: A Literature Review of Engineers Information Needs, Seeking P…
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. 10.1023/a:1005869431079
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  16. Detailed overview
  17. Hungry hungry hippos game
  18. Standards are everywhere: An information literacy approach to standards education
  19. The Essentials of Technical Communication
  20. Sound activated mobile, by G. E. Hyman and L. J. Greenberg
  21. Toy chest, by W. L. Slater
  22. Composite structure using chenille stem and inflated balloon, by W. P. Slivinski
  23. Toy gun having an offset projectile launch and transparent viewfinding plunger, by J. J. Smith
  24. Toy ride-in airplane, by K. D. Temple
  25. Revising Prose
  26. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018 - 2019