Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures

Olga Dysthe University of Bergen

Abstract

This article focuses on supervising professors’ and master’s degree students’ understanding and experiences of supervision practices in a Norwegian university, with focus on differences in text cultures and text norms between and within three academic disciplines. The interview study shows that each discipline is a heterogeneous discourse community with largely unarticulated differences. The findings suggest three supervision models, described as teaching, partnership, and apprenticeship. Dominant trends in supervisory relationships and textual practices are distinguished, and characteristics of each are outlined. Connections are shown between the models supervisors adhere to, the kind of texts they expect from their students, and how they provide feedback. As an example, conflicting attitudes toward exploratory student texts are discussed. The study shows that supervision models and textual expectations are influenced by the disciplinary text cultures in which supervisors and students take part. Finally, some practical implications of the study are suggested.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2002-10-01
DOI
10.1177/074108802238010
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bialostosky, D. H. (1989). Dialogic, pragmatic, and hermeneutic conversations: Bakhtin, Rorty, and Gadamer. C…
  2. Conrad, L. (1994). Gender and postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in pos…
  3. 10.1080/713696138
  4. 10.1080/1356215980030203
  5. Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh, PA: U…
  6. 10.2307/357434
  7. 10.1080/713696141
  8. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ:…
  9. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge Uni…
  10. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam…
  11. Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 24, 33-51.
  12. Parry, S. (1999). Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses. Higher Education, 36, 273-299.
  13. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univers…
  14. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
CrossRef global citation count: 87 View in citation network →