Abstract

This study reports about a yearlong study of the initiation of novice grant writers to the activity system of National Institutes of Health grant applications. It investigates the use of cognitive apprenticeship within writing classrooms and that of social apprenticeship in laboratories, programs, departments, and universities, which introduced students to the genre system of National Institutes of Health grant proposals and helped them in moving from peripheral participation to more central participation. While cognitive apprenticeship employs devices such as modeling, scaffolding, coaching, and collaboration to enhance learning in formal settings, social apprenticeship requires socialization, interaction, and collaboration with experts, colleagues, and peers in informal settings to acquire disciplinary knowledge and experiences. The study suggests that writing instructors should acknowledge and incorporate resources in other activity systems in which students participate, i.e., their laboratories and home departments, and teach genre systems rather than specific genres to better facilitate students' enculturation to activity systems of disciplinary discourse communities.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2008-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088307308660
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. College English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. College English
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/applin/22.2.195
  2. 10.1207/s15327884mca0404_6
  3. Bazerman, C. (2003). What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity asses…
  4. 10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317
  5. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5
  6. 10.1080/00220671.1990.10885987
  7. 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  8. Brown, J., Collins, A. & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing …
  9. 10.2307/357655
  10. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9
  11. Engestrom, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary ca…
  12. 10.1007/BF02504836
  13. 10.2307/376038
  14. Geisler, C. (2003). When management becomes personal: An activity-theoretic analysis of Palm™ technologies. I…
  15. 10.2307/358198
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00450.x
  17. 10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00009
  18. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Na…
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  20. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  21. Smart, G. (2003). A central bank's “communication strategy”: The interplay of activity, discourse genres, and…
  22. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  23. 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9
  24. 10.1075/pbns.41.06swa
  25. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
CrossRef global citation count: 56 View in citation network →