Addressing an Unfulfilled Expectation: Teaching Students With Disabilities to Write Scientific Arguments

Susan De La Paz University of Maryland, College Park ; Daniel M. Levin University of Maryland, College Park ; Cameron Butler University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Students with disabilities (SWD) in general education science classes are expected to engage in the scientific practices and potentially in the writing of arguments drawn from evidence. Currently, however, there are few research-based instructional approaches for teaching argument writing for these students. The present article responds to this need through the application of an instructional model that promises to improve the ability of SWDs to write scientific arguments. We approach this work in multiple ways. First, we clarify our target group, students with high incidence disabilities (learning disability, ADHD, and students with speech and language impairments), and discuss common cognitive challenges they experience. We then explore the role of argumentation in science, review research on both experts’ (scientists’) and novices’ (students’) argument writing and highlight successful cognitive strategies for teaching argument writing with neurotypical learners. We further discuss SWDs’ general writing challenges and how researchers have improved their abilities to comprehend and evaluate scientific information and improve their domain-general writing. Cognitive apprenticeships appear advantageous for teaching SWDs science content and how to write scientific arguments, as this form of instruction begins with problem solving tasks that connect literacy (e.g., reading, writing, argumentation discourse) with epistemic reasoning in a given domain. We illustrate the potential of such apprenticeships by analyzing the conceptual quality of arguments written by three SWDs who participated in a larger quantitative study in which they and others showed improvement in the structure of their arguments. We end with suggestions for further research to expand the use of cognitive apprenticeships.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221149093
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (131) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.1080/09500691003677889
  2. 10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_45
  3. 10.1080/09500690601075629
  4. 10.3102/0013189X032008010
  5. Pedagogy—Teaching for learning
Show all 131 →
  1. 10.1002/tea.21484
  2. 10.1177/001440291007700105
  3. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x
  4. The psychology of written composition
  5. 10.1002/sce.20402
  6. 10.1080/03004279.2014.929722
  7. 10.1002/sce.20278
  8. 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  9. 10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x
  10. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.01.009
  11. 10.1007/978-3-030-02245-7_12
  12. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference
  13. Chaopricha S. (1997). Coauthoring as learning and enculturation: A study of writing in biochemistry [Unpublis…
  14. 10.1080/07370008.2016.1145120
  15. American Educator
  16. 10.1207/sldrp1402_3
  17. 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
  18. 10.1177/07319487221119365
  19. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.001
  20. 10.1080/00933104.2014.908754
  21. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687
  22. 10.1177/0014402921999310
  23. 10.1002/rrq.147
  24. 10.1111/ldrp.12011
  25. 10.1080/00220973.2013.876228
  26. 10.4018/978-1-6684-3745-2.ch013
  27. 10.1111/ldrp.12270
  28. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  29. 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00050-7
  30. 10.1002/tea.21468
  31. 10.1080/03057260208560187
  32. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
  33. 10.1002/sce.21740
  34. 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
  35. 10.1007/s11251-018-9477-x
  36. Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention
  37. Cognitive processes in writing
  38. Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production
  39. Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms: A universal design for learning approach
  40. 10.1177/0014402914527238
  41. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
  42. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1514303
  43. Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve
  44. 10.3102/0034654320914744
  45. 10.1021/ed084p1371
  46. Argument-driven inquiry in physical science: Lab investigations for grades 6-8
  47. 10.1163/9789460911453_012
  48. 10.1007/s10648-020-09550-0
  49. 10.1111/ldrp.12260
  50. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance
  51. 10.3102/00028312043002295
  52. Writing and reading connections
  53. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications
  54. 10.1007/s11145-018-9841-x
  55. 10.1002/tea.1025
  56. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_1
  57. 10.1007/s10972-014-9406-z
  58. 10.1177/0888406417745655
  59. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  60. 10.1002/sce.20395
  61. Learning Disability Quarterly
  62. 10.1177/0014402921999310
  63. 10.1177/07319487221119365
  64. 10.4324/9780429423635-11
  65. 10.1086/392759
  66. Handbook of research on science education
  67. Science assessment: Research and practical approaches
  68. 10.1080/10508400903013488
  69. 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
  70. 10.1002/sce.21246
  71. 10.1080/10573569.2013.758561
  72. 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00342.x
  73. 10.1177/019874291003500205
  74. 10.1177/8756870517723617
  75. Supporting Grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidenc…
  76. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation
  77. Bridging the literacy achievement gap, grades 4
  78. 10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
  79. 10.1080/00220272.2014.904444
  80. Monte-Sano C., De La Paz S., Felton M., Worland K., Yee L. S., Carey R. L. (2017). Learning to teach discipli…
  81. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.869
  82. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education
  83. National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-…
  84. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas
  85. National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The Nation…
  86. Written Communication
  87. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00841.x
  88. Next generation science standards: For states, by states
  89. 10.1007/s11165-011-9215-8
  90. 10.1002/tea.20035
  91. 10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_1
  92. 10.1002/tea.21073
  93. 10.1177/0022219420982981
  94. 10.3102/0034654313487606
  95. 10.1086/518623
  96. Journal of Learning Disabilities Quarterly
  97. 10.1207/s1532690xci1301_3
  98. 10.1002/sce.20264
  99. 10.1002/sce.20421
  100. 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
  101. 10.4324/9781410610317
  102. 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
  103. 10.1080/09500693.2021.1908641
  104. Journal of Writing Research
  105. 10.1177/00220574211033256
  106. 10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
  107. 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
  108. 10.21423/jaawge-v1i2a86
    Journal of African American Women and Girls in Education  
  109. 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00086
  110. 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00340.x
  111. The uses of argument
  112. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years
  113. U.S. Department of Education. (2021). 43rd annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals…
  114. Handbook of learning disabilities
  115. Thought and language
  116. 10.1002/tea.21082
  117. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1264033
  118. Language and literacy: Functional approaches
  119. Wilensky U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo
  120. 10.3102/00028312028003495
  121. 10.1177/0022219420904343
  122. 10.1002/sce.10042
  123. 10.1080/09500690500336601
  124. Written Communication
  125. 10.1039/9781788012645-00142
  126. 10.1006/ceps.1997.0919