Prompting Reflection: Using Corpus Linguistic Methods in the Local Assessment of Reflective Writing

Cara Marta Messina Jacksonville State University ; Cherice Escobar Jones Northeastern University ; Mya Poe Northeastern University

Abstract

We report on a college-level study of student reflection and instructor prompts using scoring and corpus analysis methods. We collected 340 student reflections and 24 faculty prompts. Reflections were scored using trait and holistic scoring and then reflections and faculty prompts were analyzed using Natural Language Processing to identify linguistic features of high, middle, and low scoring reflections. The data sets were then connected to determine if there was a relationship between faculty prompts and scores. Additional analysis was completed to determine if there was a relationship between scores and students’ GPAs. The corpus linguistics analysis showed that higher-scoring reflections used words that referred to the self, the writing process, and specific rhetorical terms. Additional analysis showed student GPAs did not correlate with holistic scores but that higher scoring reflections were from faculty who included learning goals on reflective writing prompts. Results suggest that teachers can de-mystify reflective writing by linking learning outcomes to textual tasks and that corpus linguistics methods can provide an understanding of how local learning goals are transmitted to students.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2023-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221149425
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  3. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 11 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Written Communication
  6. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001
  2. 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273975
  3. 10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
  4. 10.5172/mra.3.2.140
  5. 10.37514/ATD-J.2011.8.2.07
  6. 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  7. 10.18608/jla.2016.32.3
  8. 10.37514/PER-B.2016.0797.2.08
  9. 10.1016/B978-012330595-4/50003-2
  10. 10.37514/JWA-J.2020.4.1.05
  11. 10.2307/358601
  12. 10.7330/9781607325161.c007
  13. 10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.004
  14. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106733
  15. 10.5070/W414155459
  16. 10.1353/csd.2015.0063
  17. 10.1007/BF02212307
  18. 10.1145/2883851.2883955
  19. 10.37514/JBW-J.2011.30.1.05
  20. 10.1145/3027385.3027394
  21. 10.1007/s40593-019-00174-2
  22. 10.1037/11193-000
  23. 10.2307/j.ctt46nsh0
  24. 10.7330/9781607325161
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →