Abstract

The use of subordination enables language users to achieve syntactic efficiency by allowing them to connect ideas in temporal/logical relation. Although the importance of subordination has been recognized in previous research on second language (L2) writing, it has been typically assessed with global indices that measure overall ratio of subordination. In order to capture more nuanced patterns in the development of L2 writing, this study measures the sophistication of subordination, considering subordination type (adverbialization, complementization, relativization) and finiteness (finite, nonfinite). Our natural language processing analysis of 6,566 timed impromptu essays using the Subordination Sophistication Analyzer 1.0 showed that higher-proficiency L2 learners used more subordination, and, importantly, their patterns of use differed by subordination type and finiteness. Whereas the amount of adverbialization and relativization increased along with proficiency regardless of finiteness, the use of complementization increased only for nonfinite clauses. The broader impacts of this study for education and assessment are discussed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241286900
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
  2. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
  4. 10.5054/tq.2011.244483
  5. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
  6. 10.3758/s13428-020-01456-7
  7. 10.1093/applin/amz069
  8. 10.1017/9781108643689
  9. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9
  10. 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
  11. 10.1093/applin/amac046
  12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
  13. 10.1075/ijlcr.00019.int
  14. 10.1177/0265532217712554
  15. 10.1093/applin/amu047
  16. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962
  17. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016
  18. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  19. 10.1093/applin/amp044
  20. 10.3389/feduc.2020.589965
  21. 10.1007/978-81-322-1020-7
  22. 10.1515/cllt-2017-0002
  23. 10.1177/0267658320958742
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →