Beyond the Language Barrier: Opening Spaces for ELL/Non-ELL Interaction
Abstract
Cultivating interaction among English Language Learners (ELLs) and their non-ELL peers remains a desirable, yet often elusive, goal. While existing literature documents the challenges of ELL/non-ELL interaction and proposes strategies for overcoming them, there is little research examining concrete episodes of interaction from both the ELL and non-ELL perspectives. In response, I explore how a group of refugee and immigrant high school students (ELLs and non-ELLs) negotiated their interaction while collaboratively creating a digital video. In particular, I consider the role of the “language barrier” and how the participants interacted through and despite language. In the tradition of humanities-oriented educational research, I draw on Levinasian philosophy to reflect on the relational and ethical aspects of ELL/non-ELL interaction. Findings suggest that while language played a key role, communication obstacles tended to defy simple and strategic anticipation and resolution. Negotiation of meaning was often a creative, situated, and multidirectional process. Most importantly, interaction seemed to be ultimately about people in relationship—uncertain and at times uncomfortable, but also full of promise and opportunities for ethical response. I propose opening spaces as a new approach to ELL/non-ELL interaction that foregrounds human and ethical dimensions. Such reframing dislodges the issue from common assumptions which may unwittingly reduce ELLs to a “language problem,” and it honors the potential of participants creatively working out the interaction for themselves. By pursuing insights from both ELLs and non-ELLs, this study offers an important perspective rarely explored in the literature.
- Journal
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/rte201527350
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (1)
-
Messina et al. (2023)Written Communication
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026A multidimensional approach to the impact of achievement emotions on high school students' L2 writing performance ↗Jianhua Zhang
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026LAWE-CL2: Multi-agent LLM-based automated writing evaluation system integrating linguistic features with fine-tuning for Chinese L2 writing assessment ↗Xuelin Wang; Qihao Yang; Yuxin Hao; Zhijun Wang; Sijia Guo
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Impact of Flipped-ARCS and ARCS-Integrated Instruction on Business Writing Achievement and Motivation ↗Rabiya Khalid; Sajida Zaki; Rahila Huma Anwar
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht